» Articles » PMID: 32760735

Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2020 Aug 8
PMID 32760735
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake ( = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.

Citing Articles

Opportunities to design better computer vison-assisted food diaries to support individuals and experts in dietary assessment: An observation and interview study with nutrition experts.

Chung C, Chiang P, Tan C, Wu C, Schmidt H, Kotarski A PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(11):e0000665.

PMID: 39602480 PMC: 11602110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000665.


Mobile-based program improves healthy eating of ulcerative colitis patients: A pilot study.

Tu W, Yan S, Yin T, Zhang S, Xu W, Zhang P Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231205741.

PMID: 37829613 PMC: 10566283. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231205741.


Lifestyles Under Lockdown: A Scoping Review of International Studies on Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors During COVID-19.

Cummings C, Seng K, Tweet R, Wagner J Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023; 3:830353.

PMID: 36992763 PMC: 10012117. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.830353.


Validation of Diet ID™ in Predicting Nutrient Intake Compared to Dietary Recalls, Skin Carotenoid Scores, and Plasma Carotenoids in University Students.

Radtke M, Chodur G, Bissell M, Kemp L, Medici V, Steinberg F Nutrients. 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36678280 PMC: 9865232. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020409.


Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness.

Mueller-Stierlin A, Teasdale S, Dinc U, Moerkl S, Prinz N, Becker T Nutrients. 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 34445022 PMC: 8401183. DOI: 10.3390/nu13082862.

References
1.
Yoshizawa K, Willett W, Yuan C . Reliability of Repeated Measures of Nutrient Intake by Diet Records in Residents in the Western Region of Japan. Nutrients. 2019; 11(10). PMC: 6835429. DOI: 10.3390/nu11102515. View

2.
Wakimoto P, Block G, Mandel S, Medina N . Development and reliability of brief dietary assessment tools for Hispanics. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006; 3(3):A95. PMC: 1637803. View

3.
Putz P, Kogler B, Bersenkowitsch I . Reliability and validity of assessing energy and nutrient intake with the Vienna food record: a cross-over randomised study. Nutr J. 2019; 18(1):7. PMC: 6350393. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-019-0431-9. View

4.
Morel S, Portolese O, Chertouk Y, Leahy J, Bertout L, Laverdiere C . Development and relative validation of a food frequency questionnaire for French-Canadian adolescent and young adult survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nutr J. 2018; 17(1):45. PMC: 5911374. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-018-0355-9. View

5.
Martin C, Han H, Coulon S, Allen H, Champagne C, Anton S . A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method. Br J Nutr. 2008; 101(3):446-56. PMC: 2626133. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508027438. View