» Articles » PMID: 32750065

In Pursuit of Visual Attention: SSVEP Frequency-tagging Moving Targets

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Aug 5
PMID 32750065
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has shown that visual attention does not always exactly follow gaze direction, leading to the concepts of overt and covert attention. However, it is not yet clear how such covert shifts of visual attention to peripheral regions impact the processing of the targets we directly foveate as they move in our visual field. The current study utilised the co-registration of eye-position and EEG recordings while participants tracked moving targets that were embedded with a 30 Hz frequency tag in a Steady State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) paradigm. When the task required attention to be divided between the moving target (overt attention) and a peripheral region where a second target might appear (covert attention), the SSVEPs elicited by the tracked target at the 30 Hz frequency band were significantly, but transiently, lower than when participants did not have to covertly monitor for a second target. Our findings suggest that neural responses of overt attention are only briefly reduced when attention is divided between covert and overt areas. This neural evidence is in line with theoretical accounts describing attention as a pool of finite resources, such as the perceptual load theory. Altogether, these results have practical implications for many real-world situations where covert shifts of attention may discretely reduce visual processing of objects even when they are directly being tracked with the eyes.

Citing Articles

Distinct visual processing networks for foveal and peripheral visual fields.

Zhang J, Zhou H, Wang S Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1259.

PMID: 39367101 PMC: 11452663. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06980-2.


Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Mechanisms behind Flickering Light Stimulus Processing.

Mankowska N, Grzywinska M, Winklewski P, Marcinkowska A Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36552230 PMC: 9774938. DOI: 10.3390/biology11121720.


The Relative Contribution of Executive Functions and Aging on Attentional Control During Road Crossing.

Nicholls V, Wiener J, Meso A, Miellet S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:912446.

PMID: 35645940 PMC: 9133663. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912446.


Assessing the Effect of the Refresh Rate of a Device on Various Motion Stimulation Frequencies Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potentials.

Han C, Xu G, Zheng X, Tian P, Zhang K, Yan W Front Neurosci. 2022; 15:757679.

PMID: 35069096 PMC: 8777290. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.757679.

References
1.
Renton A, Painter D, Mattingley J . Differential Deployment of Visual Attention During Interactive Approach and Avoidance Behavior. Cereb Cortex. 2018; 29(6):2366-2383. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy105. View

2.
Miskovic V, Keil A . Reliability of event-related EEG functional connectivity during visual entrainment: magnitude squared coherence and phase synchrony estimates. Psychophysiology. 2014; 52(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12287. View

3.
Dienes Z . Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(3):274-90. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406920. View

4.
Kim Y, Grabowecky M, Paller K, Muthu K, Suzuki S . Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 10(1):117-25. DOI: 10.1038/nn1821. View

5.
Grgic R, Calore E, deSperati C . Covert enaction at work: Recording the continuous movements of visuospatial attention to visible or imagined targets by means of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs). Cortex. 2015; 74:31-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.008. View