» Articles » PMID: 24385588

Foveal Analysis and Peripheral Selection During Active Visual Sampling

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Jan 4
PMID 24385588
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human vision is an active process in which information is sampled during brief periods of stable fixation in between gaze shifts. Foveal analysis serves to identify the currently fixated object and has to be coordinated with a peripheral selection process of the next fixation location. Models of visual search and scene perception typically focus on the latter, without considering foveal processing requirements. We developed a dual-task noise classification technique that enables identification of the information uptake for foveal analysis and peripheral selection within a single fixation. Human observers had to use foveal vision to extract visual feature information (orientation) from different locations for a psychophysical comparison. The selection of to-be-fixated locations was guided by a different feature (luminance contrast). We inserted noise in both visual features and identified the uptake of information by looking at correlations between the noise at different points in time and behavior. Our data show that foveal analysis and peripheral selection proceeded completely in parallel. Peripheral processing stopped some time before the onset of an eye movement, but foveal analysis continued during this period. Variations in the difficulty of foveal processing did not influence the uptake of peripheral information and the efficacy of peripheral selection, suggesting that foveal analysis and peripheral selection operated independently. These results provide important theoretical constraints on how to model target selection in conjunction with foveal object identification: in parallel and independently.

Citing Articles

Contributions of distractor dwelling, skipping, and revisiting to age differences in visual search.

Wiegand I, van Pouderoijen M, Oosterman J, Deckers K, Horstmann G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1801.

PMID: 39805864 PMC: 11730621. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83532-y.


Fast Feature- and Category-Related Parafoveal Previewing Support Free Visual Exploration.

Fakche C, Hickey C, Jensen O J Neurosci. 2024; 44(49).

PMID: 39455256 PMC: 11622175. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0841-24.2024.


Different temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual processing during fixation.

de la Malla C, Poletti M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(37):e2408067121.

PMID: 39226351 PMC: 11406286. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408067121.


Inferential eye movement control while following dynamic gaze.

Han N, Eckstein M Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37615158 PMC: 10473837. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.83187.


Foveal vision anticipates defining features of eye movement targets.

Kroell L, Rolfs M Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36082940 PMC: 9581528. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78106.


References
1.
Henderson J, Ferreira F . Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990; 16(3):417-29. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.417. View

2.
Ratcliff R . Modeling response signal and response time data. Cogn Psychol. 2006; 53(3):195-237. PMC: 2397556. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002. View

3.
Pointer J, Hess R . The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range. Vision Res. 1989; 29(9):1133-51. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90061-8. View

4.
Zelinsky G . A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychol Rev. 2008; 115(4):787-835. PMC: 2577318. DOI: 10.1037/a0013118. View

5.
VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C . Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(1):4-14. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322755502. View