» Articles » PMID: 32719900

Radiographic Bone Level Around Particular Laser-treated Dental Implants: 1 to 6 years Multicenter Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Jul 29
PMID 32719900
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, in terms of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and peri-implantitis incidence, of a titanium implants with an innovative laser-treated surface.

Materials And Methods: A total of 502 dental implants were inserted in four dental practices (Udine, Arezzo, Frascati, Roma) between 2008 and 2013. All inserted implants had laser-modified surface characterized by a series of 20-μm-diameter holes (7-10 μm deep) every 10 μm (Synthegra®, Geass srl, Italy). The minimum follow-up period was set at 1 year after the final restoration. Radiographs were taken after implant insertion (T0), at time of loading (T1), and during the follow-up period (last recall, T2). Marginal bone loss and peri-implant disease incidence were recorded.

Results: A total of 502 implants with a maximum follow-up period of 6 years were monitored. The mean differential between T0 and T2 was 0.05 ± 1.08 mm at the mesial aspect and 0.08 ± 1.11 mm at the distal with a mean follow-up period of 35.76 ± 18.05 months. After being in function for 1 to 6 years, implants reported varying behavior: 8.8% of sites did not show any radiographic changes and 38.5% of sites showed bone resorption. The bone appeared to have been growing coronally in 50.7% of the sites measured.

Conclusion: Implants showed a maintenance of marginal bone levels over time, and in many cases, it seems that laser-modified implant surface could promote a bone growth. The low peri-implant disease incidence recorded could be attributed to the laser titanium surface features that seem to prevent bacterial colonization. Future randomized and controlled studies are needed to confirm the results of the present multi-centrical retrospective analysis.

Citing Articles

Titanium Surfaces with a Laser-Produced Microchannel Structure Enhance Pre-Osteoblast Proliferation, Maturation, and Extracellular Mineralization In Vitro.

Chen Y, Chiang T, Chen I, Yuh D, Tseng H, Wang C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542358 PMC: 10970313. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063388.


Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation With Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Implant Stability Quotient at Different Time Intervals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shenoy A, Ganapathy D, Maiti S Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52160.

PMID: 38344646 PMC: 10859061. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52160.

References
1.
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B . A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x. View

2.
Laurell L, Lundgren D . Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 13(1):19-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00182.x. View

3.
Gracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P, Vult von Steyern P, Zwahlen M, Sailer I . Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 6:202-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x. View

4.
Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Fabbro M . Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010; 14(5):646-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00304.x. View

5.
De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S, Ruyffelaert C, Cosyn J, Sennerby L . Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri-implant health. Periodontol 2000. 2013; 62(1):256-70. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12004. View