» Articles » PMID: 29487988

Biofilms Developed On Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Overview
Journal Curr Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Mar 1
PMID 29487988
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbial biofilms developed on dental implants play a major role in perimplantitis' pathogenesis. Many studies have indicated that surface roughness is the main feature favoring biofilm development in vitro, but its actual influence in vivo has still to be confirmed. In this study, the amount of biofilm formed on differently treated titanium surfaces, showing distinct roughness, has been examined both in vivo and in vitro by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. In vitro studies availed of biofilm developed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or by salivary bacteria from volunteer donors. In vivo biofilm production was obtained by exposing titanium discs to the oral cavity of healthy volunteers. In vitro experiments showed that P. aeruginosa and, to a lesser extent, salivary bacteria produce more biomass and develop thicker biofilms on laser-treated and sandblasted titanium surfaces with respect to machined ones. In vivo experiments confirmed that bacterial colonization starts on sites of surface unevenness, but failed to disclose biomass differences among biofilms formed on surfaces with different roughness. Our study revealed that biofilm developed in vitro is more easily influenced by surface features than biofilm formed by complex communities in the mouth, where the cooperation of a variety of bacterial species and the presence of a wide range of nutrients and conditions allow bacteria to optimize substrate colonization. Therefore, quantitative differences observed in vitro among surfaces with different characteristics may not be predictive of different colonization rates in vivo.

Citing Articles

Effect of implant abutment surface treatments on bacterial biofilm composition and structure.

Anitua E, Murias-Freijo A, Tierno R, Tejero R, Alkhraisat M J Oral Microbiol. 2025; 17(1):2459922.

PMID: 39916977 PMC: 11800344. DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2459922.


Peri-Implantitis-Associated Microbiota before and after Peri-Implantitis Treatment, the Biofilm "Competitive Balancing" Effect: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Di Spirito F, Pisano M, Di Palo M, Franci G, Rupe A, Fiorino A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39458274 PMC: 11509653. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12101965.


Comparison of the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on oral biofilm removal from implant surfaces with various application times for the treatment of peri-implantitis defects: ex vivo study.

Hashim A, Din N, El-Khazragy N, Almalahy H BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):980.

PMID: 39174958 PMC: 11342501. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04698-5.


Influence of elastomeric and steel ligatures on periodontal health during fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hussain U, Campobasso A, Noman M, Alam S, Mujeeb R, Shehzad S Prog Orthod. 2024; 25(1):24.

PMID: 38880839 PMC: 11180646. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-024-00520-8.


Tribocorrosion of 3D printed dental implants: An overview.

De Stefano M, Singh K, Raina A, Mohan S, Ul Haq M, Ruggiero A J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024; 19(3):644-663.

PMID: 38807965 PMC: 11131088. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.05.004.


References
1.
van Dijk J, Herkstroter F, Busscher H, Weerkamp A, Jansen H, Arends J . Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1987; 14(5):300-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb01537.x. View

2.
Rybtke M, Hultqvist L, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T . Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections: Community Structure, Antimicrobial Tolerance and Immune Response. J Mol Biol. 2015; 427(23):3628-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.08.016. View

3.
Sanchez M, Llama-Palacios A, Fernandez E, Figuero E, Marin M, Leon R . An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces. Dent Mater. 2014; 30(10):1161-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.008. View

4.
Shibata Y, Tanimoto Y . A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part I: Surface optimization for rapid osseointegration. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 59(1):20-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.11.007. View

5.
Drago L, Bortolin M, De Vecchi E, Agrappi S, Weinstein R, Mattina R . Antibiofilm activity of sandblasted and laser-modified titanium against microorganisms isolated from peri-implantitis lesions. J Chemother. 2016; 28(5):383-9. DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2016.1158489. View