» Articles » PMID: 18842169

Evaluation of a New Laser Surface Implant: Scanning Electron Microscopy/energy Dispersive X-ray and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analyses

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Biology
Date 2008 Oct 10
PMID 18842169
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The roughness and the purity of implant surfaces are key points in the osteointegration process. The surfaces obtained by classic methods present irregular non-reproducible patterns and furthermore contaminate the implant surface with materials other than titanium which interfere with the process of osteointegration. The aim of the present study is to evaluate, by SEM/EDX and XPS analyses, the surface microstructure and the purity of new laser-treated implant surfaces. The laser treatment of the surface allows to set parameters to determine the roughness in order to obtain a regular and repeatable surface. Furthermore, there being no contact between the implant and the machine, there is no surface contamination with elements other than titanium. In this study we used a diode-pumped solid state laser (DPSS) with Nd:YAG source operating in Q-Switching mode on titanium samples. The resulting samples were analysed by SEM/EDX and XPS to evaluate morphology and purity of the surface. The results show surfaces with very regular roughness and a total absence of contamination.

Citing Articles

Titanium Surfaces with a Laser-Produced Microchannel Structure Enhance Pre-Osteoblast Proliferation, Maturation, and Extracellular Mineralization In Vitro.

Chen Y, Chiang T, Chen I, Yuh D, Tseng H, Wang C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542358 PMC: 10970313. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063388.


Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: current trends, recent developments, and future prospects.

Hoque M, Showva N, Ahmed M, Rashid A, Sadique S, El-Bialy T Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11300.

PMID: 36387463 PMC: 9640965. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11300.


Gingival Response to Dental Implant: Comparison Study on the Effects of New Nanopored Laser-Treated vs. Traditional Healing Abutments.

Ghinassi B, Di Baldassarre A, DAddazio G, Traini T, Andrisani M, Di Vincenzo G Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17).

PMID: 32842709 PMC: 7504205. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176056.


Radiographic bone level around particular laser-treated dental implants: 1 to 6 years multicenter retrospective study.

Mongardini C, Zeza B, Pelagalli P, Blasone R, Scilla M, Berardini M Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6(1):29.

PMID: 32719900 PMC: 7385050. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00230-w.


Comparative evaluation among laser-treated, machined, and sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: an in vivo histologic analysis on sheep.

De Tullio I, Berardini M, Di Iorio D, Perfetti F, Perfetti G Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6(1):7.

PMID: 32072319 PMC: 7028891. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0204-4.