» Articles » PMID: 32719571

Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment

Overview
Journal J Polit Econ
Date 2020 Jul 29
PMID 32719571
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In most US health insurance markets, plans face strong incentives to "upcode" the patient diagnoses they report to the regulator, as these affect the risk-adjusted payments plans receive. We show that enrollees in private Medicare plans generate 6% to 16% higher diagnosis-based risk scores than they would under fee-for-service Medicare, where diagnoses do not affect most provider payments. Our estimates imply that upcoding generates billions in excess public spending and significant distortions to firm and consumer behavior. We show that coding intensity increases with vertical integration, suggesting a principal-agent problem faced by insurers, who desire more intense coding from the providers with whom they contract.

Citing Articles

Opaque ontology: neuroimaging classification of ICD-10 diagnostic groups in the UK Biobank.

Easley T, Luo X, Hannon K, Lenzini P, Bijsterbosch J Gigascience. 2025; 14.

PMID: 39931027 PMC: 11811528. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae119.


Coding intensity variation in Medicare Advantage.

Curto V, Politzer E, Anderson T, Ayanian J, Souza J, Zaslavsky A Health Aff Sch. 2025; 3(1):qxae176.

PMID: 39822237 PMC: 11736778. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae176.


Is There a VA Advantage? Evidence from Dually Eligible Veterans.

Chan D, Card D, Taylor L Am Econ Rev. 2025; 113(11):3003-3043.

PMID: 39816722 PMC: 11735001. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20211638.


Market segmentation by profit status: evidence from hospice.

Rosenkranz D, White L, Sun C, Miller K, Coe N Health Aff Sch. 2024; 2(12):qxae160.

PMID: 39677001 PMC: 11646128. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae160.


Osteoporosis testing and treatment remain low in both Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Azad T, Wu R, Anderson K, Darden M, Jain A Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(2):275-281.

PMID: 39570337 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07318-8.


References
1.
Kronick R, Welch W . Measuring coding intensity in the Medicare Advantage program. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014; 4(2). PMC: 4109819. DOI: 10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-a06. View

2.
Einav L, Finkelstein A, Ryan S, Schrimpf P, Cullen M . Selection on Moral Hazard in Health Insurance. Am Econ Rev. 2014; 103(1):178-219. PMC: 3989940. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.178. View

3.
Bundorf M, Levin J, Mahoney N . Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice. Am Econ Rev. 2018; 102(7):3214-48. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3214. View

4.
Baicker K, Chernew M, Robbins J . The spillover effects of Medicare managed care: Medicare Advantage and hospital utilization. J Health Econ. 2013; 32(6):1289-300. PMC: 3855665. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.005. View

5.
Sinaiko A, Afendulis C, Frank R . Enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans in Miami-Dade County: evidence of status quo bias?. Inquiry. 2014; 50(3):202-15. PMC: 4108259. DOI: 10.1177/0046958013516586. View