» Articles » PMID: 32612216

Terabase-scale Metagenome Coassembly with MetaHipMer

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jul 3
PMID 32612216
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metagenome sequence datasets can contain terabytes of reads, too many to be coassembled together on a single shared-memory computer; consequently, they have only been assembled sample by sample (multiassembly) and combining the results is challenging. We can now perform coassembly of the largest datasets using MetaHipMer, a metagenome assembler designed to run on supercomputers and large clusters of compute nodes. We have reported on the implementation of MetaHipMer previously; in this paper we focus on analyzing the impact of very large coassembly. In particular, we show that coassembly recovers a larger genome fraction than multiassembly and enables the discovery of more complete genomes, with lower error rates, whereas multiassembly recovers more dominant strain variation. Being able to coassemble a large dataset does not preclude one from multiassembly; rather, having a fast, scalable metagenome assembler enables a user to more easily perform coassembly and multiassembly, and assemble both abundant, high strain variation genomes, and low-abundance, rare genomes. We present several assemblies of terabyte datasets that could never be coassembled before, demonstrating MetaHipMer's scaling power. MetaHipMer is available for public use under an open source license and all datasets used in the paper are available for public download.

Citing Articles

GenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies.

Zhou Z, Riley R, Kautsar S, Wu W, Egan R, Hofmeyr S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975405 PMC: 11838515. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.30.635558.


Metagenome-assembled-genomes recovered from the Arctic drift expedition MOSAiC.

Boulton W, Salamov A, Grigoriev I, Calhoun S, Labutti K, Riley R Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):204.

PMID: 39904998 PMC: 11794607. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04525-8.


A metagenomic perspective on the microbial prokaryotic genome census.

Wu D, Seshadri R, Kyrpides N, Ivanova N Sci Adv. 2025; 11(3):eadq2166.

PMID: 39823337 PMC: 11740963. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq2166.


Coassembly and binning of a twenty-year metagenomic time-series from Lake Mendota.

Oliver T, Varghese N, Roux S, Schulz F, Huntemann M, Clum A Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):966.

PMID: 39231974 PMC: 11374980. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03826-8.


From soil to sequence: filling the critical gap in genome-resolved metagenomics is essential to the future of soil microbial ecology.

Anthony W, Allison S, Broderick C, Rodriguez L, Clum A, Cross H Environ Microbiome. 2024; 19(1):56.

PMID: 39095861 PMC: 11295382. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-024-00599-w.


References
1.
Wendl M, Kota K, Weinstock G, Mitreva M . Coverage theories for metagenomic DNA sequencing based on a generalization of Stevens' theorem. J Math Biol. 2012; 67(5):1141-61. PMC: 3795925. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0586-x. View

2.
Stanhope S . Occupancy modeling, maximum contig size probabilities and designing metagenomics experiments. PLoS One. 2010; 5(7):e11652. PMC: 2912229. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011652. View

3.
Deng X, Naccache S, Ng T, Federman S, Li L, Chiu C . An ensemble strategy that significantly improves de novo assembly of microbial genomes from metagenomic next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e46. PMC: 4402509. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv002. View

4.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner P . metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017; 27(5):824-834. PMC: 5411777. DOI: 10.1101/gr.213959.116. View

5.
Peng Y, Leung H, Yiu S, Chin F . IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(11):1420-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174. View