» Articles » PMID: 32581699

Accurate MR Image Registration to Anatomical Reference Space for Diffuse Glioma

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32581699
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To summarize the distribution of glioma location within a patient population, registration of individual MR images to anatomical reference space is required. In this study, we quantified the accuracy of MR image registration to anatomical reference space with linear and non-linear transformations using estimated tumor targets of glioblastoma and lower-grade glioma, and anatomical landmarks at pre- and post-operative time-points using six commonly used registration packages (FSL, SPM5, DARTEL, ANTs, Elastix, and NiftyReg). Routine clinical pre- and post-operative, post-contrast T1-weighted images of 20 patients with glioblastoma and 20 with lower-grade glioma were collected. The 2009a Montreal Neurological Institute brain template was used as anatomical reference space. Tumors were manually segmented in the patient space and corresponding healthy tissue was delineated as a target volume in the anatomical reference space. Accuracy of the tumor alignment was quantified using the Dice score and the Hausdorff distance. To measure the accuracy of general brain alignment, anatomical landmarks were placed in patient and in anatomical reference space, and the landmark distance after registration was quantified. Lower-grade gliomas were registered more accurately than glioblastoma. Registration accuracy for pre- and post-operative MR images did not differ. SPM5 and DARTEL registered tumors most accurate, and FSL least accurate. Non-linear transformations resulted in more accurate general brain alignment than linear transformations, but tumor alignment was similar between linear and non-linear transformation. We conclude that linear transformation suffices to summarize glioma locations in anatomical reference space.

Citing Articles

Predicting Cognitive Functioning for Patients with a High-Grade Glioma: Evaluating Different Representations of Tumor Location in a Common Space.

Boelders S, De Baene W, Postma E, Gehring K, Ong L Neuroinformatics. 2024; 22(3):329-352.

PMID: 38900230 PMC: 11329426. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-024-09671-9.


Three-dimensional histology reveals dissociable human hippocampal long-axis gradients of Alzheimer's pathology.

Ortega-Cruz D, Bress K, Gazula H, Rabano A, Iglesias J, Strange B Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(4):2606-2619.

PMID: 38369763 PMC: 11032559. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13695.


Fibre orientation atlas guided rapid segmentation of white matter tracts.

Young F, Aquilina K, Seunarine K, Mancini L, Clark C, Clayden J Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(2):e26578.

PMID: 38339907 PMC: 10826637. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26578.


Increasing-Margin Adversarial (IMA) training to improve adversarial robustness of neural networks.

Ma L, Liang L Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023; 240:107687.

PMID: 37392695 PMC: 10527180. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107687.


Identifying clinically applicable machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation: recent advances and discoveries.

Tillmanns N, Lum A, Cassinelli G, Merkaj S, Verma T, Zeevi T Neurooncol Adv. 2022; 4(1):vdac093.

PMID: 36071926 PMC: 9446682. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac093.


References
1.
Avants B, Tustison N, Wu J, Cook P, Gee J . An open source multivariate framework for n-tissue segmentation with evaluation on public data. Neuroinformatics. 2011; 9(4):381-400. PMC: 3297199. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-011-9109-y. View

2.
Liu T, Achrol A, Mitchell L, Du W, Loya J, Rodriguez S . Computational Identification of Tumor Anatomic Location Associated with Survival in 2 Large Cohorts of Human Primary Glioblastomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(4):621-8. PMC: 4833648. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4631. View

3.
Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J, Zilles K . A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001; 356(1412):1293-322. PMC: 1088516. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0915. View

4.
Durand-Dubief F, Belaroussi B, Armspach J, Dufour M, Roggerone S, Vukusic S . Reliability of longitudinal brain volume loss measurements between 2 sites in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of 7 quantification techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(10):1918-24. PMC: 7964600. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3107. View

5.
Mohamed A, Zacharaki E, Shen D, Davatzikos C . Deformable registration of brain tumor images via a statistical model of tumor-induced deformation. Med Image Anal. 2006; 10(5):752-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2006.06.005. View