» Articles » PMID: 26945974

The First Step for Neuroimaging Data Analysis: DICOM to NIfTI Conversion

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Mar 7
PMID 26945974
Citations 406
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical imaging data are typically stored and transferred in the DICOM format, whereas the NIfTI format has been widely adopted by scientists in the neuroimaging community. Therefore, a vital initial step in processing the data is to convert images from the complicated DICOM format to the much simpler NIfTI format. While there are a number of tools that usually handle DICOM to NIfTI conversion seamlessly, some variations can disrupt this process.

New Method: We provide some insight into the challenges faced with image conversion. First, different manufacturers implement the DICOM format differently which complicates the conversion. Second, different modalities and sub-modalities may need special treatment during conversion. Lastly, the image transferring and archiving can also impact the DICOM conversion.

Results: We present results in several error-prone domains, including the slice order for functional imaging, phase encoding direction for distortion correction, effect of diffusion gradient direction, and effect of gantry correction for some imaging modality.

Comparison With Existing Methods: Conversion tools are often designed for a specific manufacturer or modality. The tools and insight we present here are aimed at different manufacturers or modalities.

Conclusions: The imaging conversion is complicated by the variation of images. An understanding of the conversion basics can be helpful for identifying the source of the error. Here we provide users with simple methods for detecting and correcting problems. This also serves as an overview for developers who wish to either develop their own tools or adapt the open source tools created by the authors.

Citing Articles

Associations of Device-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time With Neural Responses to Visual Food Cues in Adults: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Dera A, Hinton E, Batterham R, Davies M, King J, Miyashita M Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70192.

PMID: 40071542 PMC: 11897806. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70192.


A Protocol for Body MRI/CT and Extraction of Imaging-Derived Phenotypes (IDPs) from the China Phenobank Project.

Wang C, Wang S, Hua S, Li R, Li Y, Shi Z Phenomics. 2025; 4(6):594-616.

PMID: 40061820 PMC: 11889319. DOI: 10.1007/s43657-023-00141-x.


Distinct White Matter Fiber Density Patterns in Bipolar and Depressive Disorders: Insights from Fixel-Based Analysis.

Manelis A, Hu H, Satz S, Iyengar S, Satish I, Swartz Holly A medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034779 PMC: 11875326. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.19.25322569.


A Case for Automated Segmentation of MRI Data in Milder Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Lewis C, Johnston J, DSouza P, Kolstad J, Zoppo C, Vardar Z medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034761 PMC: 11875249. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.25322304.


Addressing Multi-Center Variability in Radiomic Analysis: A Comparative Study of Image Acquisition Methods Across Two 3T MRI Scanners.

Tocila-Matasel C, Dudea S, Iana G Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002637 PMC: 11854186. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040485.