» Articles » PMID: 32556919

Tracking and Visualization of the Sensing Area for a Tethered Laparoscopic Gamma Probe

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32556919
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In surgical oncology, complete cancer resection and lymph node identification are challenging due to the lack of reliable intraoperative visualization. Recently, endoscopic radio-guided cancer resection has been introduced where a novel tethered laparoscopic gamma detector can be used to determine the location of tracer activity, which can complement preoperative nuclear imaging data and endoscopic imaging. However, these probes do not clearly indicate where on the tissue surface the activity originates, making localization of pathological sites difficult and increasing the mental workload of the surgeons. Therefore, a robust real-time gamma probe tracking system integrated with augmented reality is proposed.

Methods: A dual-pattern marker has been attached to the gamma probe, which combines chessboard vertices and circular dots for higher detection accuracy. Both patterns are detected simultaneously based on blob detection and the pixel intensity-based vertices detector and used to estimate the pose of the probe. Temporal information is incorporated into the framework to reduce tracking failure. Furthermore, we utilized the 3D point cloud generated from structure from motion to find the intersection between the probe axis and the tissue surface. When presented as an augmented image, this can provide visual feedback to the surgeons.

Results: The method has been validated with ground truth probe pose data generated using the OptiTrack system. When detecting the orientation of the pose using circular dots and chessboard dots alone, the mean error obtained is [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. As for the translation, the mean error for each pattern is 1.78 mm and 1.81 mm. The detection limits for pitch, roll and yaw are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] .

Conclusion: The performance evaluation results show that this dual-pattern marker can provide high detection rates, as well as more accurate pose estimation and a larger workspace than the previously proposed hybrid markers. The augmented reality will be used to provide visual feedback to the surgeons on the location of the affected lymph nodes or tumor.

Citing Articles

Occlusion-robust markerless surgical instrument pose estimation.

Xu H, Giannarou S Healthc Technol Lett. 2024; 11(6):327-335.

PMID: 39720750 PMC: 11665797. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12100.


Surgical radioguidance with beta-emitting radionuclides; challenges and possibilities: A position paper by the EANM.

Fragoso Costa P, Shi K, Holm S, Vidal-Sicart S, Kracmerova T, Tosi G Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(10):2903-2921.

PMID: 38189911 PMC: 11300492. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06560-2.


Simultaneous Depth Estimation and Surgical Tool Segmentation in Laparoscopic Images.

Huang B, Nguyen A, Wang S, Wang Z, Mayer E, Tuch D IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2022; 4(2):335-338.

PMID: 36148137 PMC: 7613616. DOI: 10.1109/TMRB.2022.3170215.


Real-time tracking of a diffuse reflectance spectroscopy probe used to aid histological validation of margin assessment in upper gastrointestinal cancer resection surgery.

Gkouzionis I, Nazarian S, Kawka M, Darzi A, Patel N, Peters C J Biomed Opt. 2022; 27(2).

PMID: 35106980 PMC: 8804336. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.2.025001.


How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation.

Wendler T, van Leeuwen F, Navab N, van Oosterom M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(13):4201-4224.

PMID: 34185136 PMC: 8566413. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05445-6.


References
1.
Kang X, Azizian M, Wilson E, Wu K, Martin A, Kane T . Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28(7):2227-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3433-x. View

2.
Pratt P, Jaeger A, Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer E, Vale J, Darzi A . Robust ultrasound probe tracking: initial clinical experiences during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 10(12):1905-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1279-x. View

3.
Trinh Q, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani K, Bianchi M . Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol. 2011; 61(4):679-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. View

4.
Zhang L, Ye M, Chan P, Yang G . Real-time surgical tool tracking and pose estimation using a hybrid cylindrical marker. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017; 12(6):921-930. PMC: 5447333. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1558-9. View

5.
Strong V, Humm J, Russo P, Jungbluth A, Wong W, Daghighian F . A novel method to localize antibody-targeted cancer deposits intraoperatively using handheld PET beta and gamma probes. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(2):386-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9611-3. View