» Articles » PMID: 32525885

Deep Learning for EEG-based Motor Imagery Classification: Accuracy-cost Trade-off

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jun 12
PMID 32525885
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) datasets are often small and high dimensional, owing to cumbersome recording processes. In these conditions, powerful machine learning techniques are essential to deal with the large amount of information and overcome the curse of dimensionality. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have achieved promising performance in EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) applications, but they involve computationally intensive training algorithms and hyperparameter optimization methods. Thus, an awareness of the quality-cost trade-off, although usually overlooked, is highly beneficial. In this paper, we apply a hyperparameter optimization procedure based on Genetic Algorithms to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), all of them purposely shallow. We compare their relative quality and energy-time cost, but we also analyze the variability in the structural complexity of networks of the same type with similar accuracies. The experimental results show that the optimization procedure improves accuracy in all models, and that CNN models with only one hidden convolutional layer can equal or slightly outperform a 6-layer Deep Belief Network. FFNN and RNN were not able to reach the same quality, although the cost was significantly lower. The results also highlight the fact that size within the same type of network is not necessarily correlated with accuracy, as smaller models can and do match, or even surpass, bigger ones in performance. In this regard, overfitting is likely a contributing factor since deep learning approaches struggle with limited training examples.

Citing Articles

Brain-computer interface in critical care and rehabilitation.

Oh E, Shin S, Kim S Acute Crit Care. 2024; 39(1):24-33.

PMID: 38224957 PMC: 11002623. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.01382.


Effect of the period of EEG signals on the decoding of motor information.

Zou R, Zhao L, He S, Zhou X, Yin X Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 47(1):249-260.

PMID: 38150057 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01361-1.


Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Signals Based on Data Augmentation and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Xie Y, Oniga S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4).

PMID: 36850530 PMC: 9961359. DOI: 10.3390/s23041932.


Status of deep learning for EEG-based brain-computer interface applications.

Hossain K, Islam M, Hossain S, Nijholt A, Ahad M Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 16:1006763.

PMID: 36726556 PMC: 9885375. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2022.1006763.


Mental Disorder Diagnosis from EEG Signals Employing Automated Leaning Procedures Based on Radial Basis Functions.

Lujan M, Mateo Sotos J, Torres A, Santos J, Quevedo O, Borja A J Med Biol Eng. 2022; 42(6):853-859.

PMID: 36407571 PMC: 9651124. DOI: 10.1007/s40846-022-00758-9.


References
1.
Lotte F, Bougrain L, Cichocki A, Clerc M, Congedo M, Rakotomamonjy A . A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J Neural Eng. 2018; 15(3):031005. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2. View

2.
Trapnell C, Hendrickson D, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn J, Pachter L . Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 31(1):46-53. PMC: 3869392. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2450. View

3.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

4.
Hochberg L, Serruya M, Friehs G, Mukand J, Saleh M, Caplan A . Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006; 442(7099):164-71. DOI: 10.1038/nature04970. View

5.
Ortega J, Asensio-Cubero J, Gan J, Ortiz A . Classification of motor imagery tasks for BCI with multiresolution analysis and multiobjective feature selection. Biomed Eng Online. 2016; 15 Suppl 1:73. PMC: 4959369. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0178-x. View