» Articles » PMID: 34827396

TSMG: A Deep Learning Framework for Recognizing Human Learning Style Using EEG Signals

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34827396
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Educational theory claims that integrating learning style into learning-related activities can improve academic performance. Traditional methods to recognize learning styles are mostly based on questionnaires and online behavior analyses. These methods are highly subjective and inaccurate in terms of recognition. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals have significant potential for use in the measurement of learning style. This study uses EEG signals to design a deep-learning-based model of recognition to recognize people's learning styles with EEG features by using a non-overlapping sliding window, one-dimensional spatio-temporal convolutions, multi-scale feature extraction, global average pooling, and the group voting mechanism; this model is named the TSMG model (Temporal-Spatial-Multiscale-Global model). It solves the problem of processing EEG data of variable length, and improves the accuracy of recognition of the learning style by nearly 5% compared with prevalent methods, while reducing the cost of calculation by 41.93%. The proposed TSMG model can also recognize variable-length data in other fields. The authors also formulated a dataset of EEG signals (called the LSEEG dataset) containing features of the learning style processing dimension that can be used to test and compare models of recognition. This dataset is also conducive to the application and further development of EEG technology to recognize people's learning styles.

Citing Articles

Enhancing generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis precision: MSTCNN model utilizing high-frequency EEG signals.

Liu W, Li G, Huang Z, Jiang W, Luo X, Xu X Front Psychiatry. 2024; 14:1310323.

PMID: 38179243 PMC: 10764566. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1310323.


The Dynamical Biomarkers in Functional Connectivity of Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Dynamic Graph Embedding.

Liu Y, Wang H, Ding Y Interdiscip Sci. 2023; 16(1):141-159.

PMID: 38060171 DOI: 10.1007/s12539-023-00592-w.

References
1.
Chiarelli A, Croce P, Merla A, Zappasodi F . Deep learning for hybrid EEG-fNIRS brain-computer interface: application to motor imagery classification. J Neural Eng. 2018; 15(3):036028. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaaf82. View

2.
Davelaar E, Barnby J, Almasi S, Eatough V . Differential Subjective Experiences in Learners and Non-learners in Frontal Alpha Neurofeedback: Piloting a Mixed-Method Approach. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:402. PMC: 6206258. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00402. View

3.
Garofalo S, Timmermann C, Battaglia S, Maier M, di Pellegrino G . Mediofrontal Negativity Signals Unexpected Timing of Salient Outcomes. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 29(4):718-727. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01074. View

4.
Kim K, Bang S, Kim S . Emotion recognition system using short-term monitoring of physiological signals. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2004; 42(3):419-27. DOI: 10.1007/BF02344719. View

5.
Xu Y, Haykin S, Racine R . Multiple window time-frequency distribution and coherence of EEG using Slepian sequences and hermite functions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999; 46(7):861-6. DOI: 10.1109/10.771197. View