» Articles » PMID: 32517801

What Scans We Will Read: Imaging Instrumentation Trends in Clinical Oncology

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2020 Jun 11
PMID 32517801
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging.This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now.Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as "data", and - through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a "big data" concept - move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging.

Citing Articles

Lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography is cost-effective in Greece.

Pan X, Togka K, Ten Berge H, de Jong L, Groen H, Postma M PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0316351.

PMID: 40043061 PMC: 11882067. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316351.


Innovative Imaging Techniques for Advancing Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Wang T, Ni Y, Liu L Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061245 PMC: 11274736. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142607.


Towards the Future of Public Health: Roadmapping Trends and Scenarios in the Post-COVID Healthcare Era.

El-Warrak L, Nunes M, Luna G, Barbosa C, Lyra A, Argolo M Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(24).

PMID: 38132008 PMC: 10743190. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243118.


Bacteria-Based Living Probes: Preparation and the Applications in Bioimaging and Diagnosis.

Jiang H, Cao Z, Liu Y, Liu R, Zhou Y, Liu J Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 11(4):e2306480.

PMID: 38032119 PMC: 10811517. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306480.


Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction: A state-of-the-art review from a clinical perspective.

Moyaert P, Padrela B, Morgan C, Petr J, Versijpt J, Barkhof F Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1132077.

PMID: 37139088 PMC: 10150073. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1132077.


References
1.
Wolff S, Balaban R . Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1989; 10(1):135-44. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910100113. View

2.
Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A, Stattaus J . Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(3):429-35. View

3.
Blatter C, Weingast J, Alex A, Grajciar B, Wieser W, Drexler W . In situ structural and microangiographic assessment of human skin lesions with high-speed OCT. Biomed Opt Express. 2012; 3(10):2636-46. PMC: 3469999. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.3.002636. View

4.
Dencks S, Piepenbrock M, Opacic T, Krauspe B, Stickeler E, Kiessling F . Clinical Pilot Application of Super-Resolution US Imaging in Breast Cancer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018; 66(3):517-526. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872067. View

5.
Carpentier A, Canney M, Vignot A, Reina V, Beccaria K, Horodyckid C . Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8(343):343re2. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6086. View