» Articles » PMID: 32476229

Comparison Between the Cervical and Abdominal Vagus Nerves in Mice, Pigs, and Humans

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 2
PMID 32476229
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Vagus nerve (VN) stimulation is currently evaluated as a novel approach to treat immune-mediated disorders. The optimal stimulation parameters, however, largely depend on the VN composition potentially impacting on its clinical translation. Hence, we evaluated whether morphological differences exist between the cervical and abdominal VNs across different species.

Materials And Methods: The cervical and abdominal VNs of mouse, pig, and humans were stained for major basic protein and neurofilament F to identify the percentage and size of myelinated and non-myelinated fibers.

Results: The percentage of myelinated fibers was comparable between species, but was higher in the cervical VN compared with the abdominal VN. The cervical VN contained 54 ± 4%, 47 ± 7%, and 54 ± 7% myelinated fibers in mouse, pig, and humans, respectively. The myelinated fibers consisted of small-diameter (mouse: 71%, pig: 80%, and humans: 63%), medium-diameter (mouse: 21%, pig: 18%, and humans: 33%), and large-diameter fibers (mouse: 7%, pig: 2%, and humans: 4%). The abdominal VN predominantly contained unmyelinated fibers (mouse: 93%, pig: 90%, and humans: 94%). The myelinated fibers mainly consisted of small-diameter fibers (mouse: 99%, pig: 85%, and humans: 74%) and fewer medium-diameter (mouse: 1%, pig: 13%, and humans: 23%) and large-diameter fibers (mouse: 0%, pig: 2%, and humans: 3%).

Conclusion: The VN composition was largely similar with respect to myelinated and unmyelinated fibers in the species studied. Human and porcine VNs had a comparable diameter and similar amounts of fibrous tissue and contained multiple fascicles, implying that the porcine VN may be suitable to optimize stimulation parameters for clinical trials.

Citing Articles

The Gut Microbiota's Role in Neurological, Psychiatric, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Charitos I, Inchingolo A, Ferrante L, Inchingolo F, Inchingolo A, Castellaneta F Nutrients. 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39771025 PMC: 11677138. DOI: 10.3390/nu16244404.


Remodeling of the Intracardiac Ganglia During the Development of Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutics.

Evans A, Li Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596529 PMC: 11594459. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212464.


Laterality, sexual dimorphism, and human vagal projectome heterogeneity shape neuromodulation to vagus nerve stimulation.

Biscola N, Bartmeyer P, Beshay Y, Stern E, Mihaylov P, Powley T Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1536.

PMID: 39562711 PMC: 11576867. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07222-1.


Non-invasive ventral cervical magnetoneurography as a proxy of in vivo lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation.

Bu Y, Burks J, Yang K, Prince J, Borna A, Coe C Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):893.

PMID: 39075164 PMC: 11286963. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06435-8.


Towards enhanced functionality of vagus neuroprostheses through in silico optimized stimulation.

Ciotti F, John R, Katic Secerovic N, Gozzi N, Cimolato A, Jayaprakash N Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6119.

PMID: 39033186 PMC: 11271449. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50523-6.


References
1.
Noller C, Levine Y, Urakov T, Aronson J, Nash M . Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Rodent Models: An Overview of Technical Considerations. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:911. PMC: 6738225. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00911. View

2.
Helmers S, Begnaud J, Cowley A, Corwin H, Edwards J, Holder D . Application of a computational model of vagus nerve stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012; 126(5):336-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01656.x. View

3.
Bratton B, Martelli D, McKinley M, Trevaks D, Anderson C, McAllen R . Neural regulation of inflammation: no neural connection from the vagus to splenic sympathetic neurons. Exp Physiol. 2012; 97(11):1180-5. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.061531. View

4.
Ordelman S, Kornet L, Cornelussen R, Buschman H, Veltink P . An indirect component in the evoked compound action potential of the vagal nerve. J Neural Eng. 2010; 7(6):066001. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/6/066001. View

5.
Stakenborg N, Gomez-Pinilla P, Verlinden T, Wolthuis A, dHoore A, Farre R . Comparison between the cervical and abdominal vagus nerves in mice, pigs, and humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32(9):e13889. PMC: 7507132. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13889. View