» Articles » PMID: 32386812

Comparative Evaluation of DNA-encoded Chemical Selections Performed Using DNA in Single-stranded or Double-stranded Format

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2020 May 11
PMID 32386812
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DEL) are increasingly being used for the discovery and optimization of small organic ligands to proteins of biological or pharmaceutical interest. The DNA fragments, that serve as amplifiable identification barcodes for individual compounds in the library, are typically used in double-stranded DNA format. To the best of our knowledge, a direct comparison of DEL selections featuring DNA in either single- or double-stranded DNA format has not yet been reported. In this article, we describe a comparative evaluation of selections with two DEL libraries (named GB-DEL and NF-DEL), based on different chemical designs and produced in both single- and double-stranded DNA format. The libraries were selected in identical conditions against multiple protein targets, revealing comparable and reproducible fingerprints for both types of DNA formats. Surprisingly, selections performed with single-stranded DNA barcodes exhibited improved enrichment factors compared to double-stranded DNA. Using high-affinity ligands to carbonic anhydrase IX as benchmarks for selection performance, we observed an improved selectivity for the NF-DEL library (on average 2-fold higher enrichment factors) in favor of single-stranded DNA. The enrichment factors were even higher for the GB-DEL selections (approximately 5-fold), compared to the same library in double-stranded DNA format. Collectively, these results indicate that DEL libraries can conveniently be synthesized and screened in both single- and double-stranded DNA format, but single-stranded DNA barcodes typically yield enhanced enrichment factors.

Citing Articles

Recording Binding Information Directly into DNA-Encoded Libraries Using Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase.

Schneider L, Sauter B, Dagher K, Gillingham D J Am Chem Soc. 2023; 145(38):20874-20882.

PMID: 37704585 PMC: 10540198. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c05961.


Selection methods for proximity-dependent enrichment of ligands from DNA-encoded libraries using enzymatic fusion proteins.

Cai B, Mhetre A, Krusemark C Chem Sci. 2023; 14(2):245-250.

PMID: 36687357 PMC: 9811540. DOI: 10.1039/d2sc05495g.


Photochemical Methods Applied to DNA Encoded Library (DEL) Synthesis.

Matsuo B, Granados A, Levitre G, Molander G Acc Chem Res. 2023; 56(3):385-401.

PMID: 36656960 PMC: 10415088. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00778.


Converting Double-Stranded DNA-Encoded Libraries (DELs) to Single-Stranded Libraries for More Versatile Selections.

Gui Y, Wong C, Zhao G, Xie C, Hou R, Li Y ACS Omega. 2022; 7(13):11491-11500.

PMID: 35415338 PMC: 8992267. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01152.


Macrocyclic DNA-encoded chemical libraries: a historical perspective.

Plais L, Scheuermann J RSC Chem Biol. 2022; 3(1):7-17.

PMID: 35128404 PMC: 8729180. DOI: 10.1039/d1cb00161b.


References
1.
Buller F, Steiner M, Scheuermann J, Mannocci L, Nissen I, Kohler M . High-throughput sequencing for the identification of binding molecules from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010; 20(14):4188-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.05.053. View

2.
Winssinger N . Nucleic acid-programmed assemblies: translating instruction into function in chemical biology. Chimia (Aarau). 2013; 67(5):340-8. DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2013.340. View

3.
Brenner S, Lerner R . Encoded combinatorial chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(12):5381-3. PMC: 49295. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5381. View

4.
Keppler A, Gendreizig S, Gronemeyer T, Pick H, Vogel H, Johnsson K . A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 21(1):86-9. DOI: 10.1038/nbt765. View

5.
Li X, Liu D . DNA-templated organic synthesis: nature's strategy for controlling chemical reactivity applied to synthetic molecules. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004; 43(37):4848-70. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200400656. View