Maternal Intrusiveness Predicts Infants' Event-related Potential Responses to Angry and Happy Prosody Independent of Infant Frontal Asymmetry

Overview

Journal Infancy

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pediatrics

Date 2020 May 5

PMID 32362788

Citations 6

Authors

Rens Huffmeijer

Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg

Judit Gervain

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Infants' social-cognitive skills first develop within the parent-infant relationship, but large differences between parents exist in the way they approach and interact with their infant. These may have important consequences for infants' social-cognitive development. The current study investigated effects of maternal sensitive and intrusive behavior on 6- to 7-month-old infants' ERP responses to a socio-emotional cue that infants are often confronted with from an early age: emotional prosody in infant-directed speech. Infants may differ in their sensitivity to environmental (including parenting) influences on development, and the current study also explored whether infants' resting frontal asymmetry conveys differential susceptibility to effects of maternal sensitivity and intrusiveness. Results revealed that maternal intrusiveness was related to the difference in infants' ERP responses to happy and angry utterances. Specifically, P2 amplitudes in response to angry sounds were less positive than those in response to happy sounds for infants with less intrusive mothers. Whether this difference reflects an enhanced sensitivity to emotional prosody or a (processing) preference remains to be investigated. No evidence for differential susceptibility was found, as infant frontal asymmetry did not moderate effects of sensitivity or intrusiveness.

Citing Articles

Mother-Infant Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Patterns Reflect Caregiving Profiles.

Endevelt-Shapira Y, Feldman R Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36829560 PMC: 9953313. DOI: 10.3390/biology12020284.

Examining the Role of Socioeconomic Status and Maternal Sensitivity in Predicting Functional Brain Network Connectivity in 5-Month-Old Infants.

Chajes J, Stern J, Kelsey C, Grossmann T Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:892482.

PMID: 35757535 PMC: 9226752. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.892482.

Supporting early infant relationships and reducing maternal distress with the Newborn Behavioral Observations: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial.

Nicolson S, Carron S, Paul C Infant Ment Health J. 2022; 43(3):455-473.

PMID: 35531961 PMC: 9324818. DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21987.

Infant social interactions and brain development: A systematic review.

Ilyka D, Johnson M, Lloyd-Fox S Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 130:448-469.

PMID: 34506843 PMC: 8522805. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.001.

Examining the bidirectional relationships between maternal intrusiveness and child internalizing symptoms in a community sample: A longitudinal study from infancy to middle childhood.

Hunter H, Allen K, Liu R, Jaekel J, Bell M Depress Anxiety. 2021; 38(12):1245-1255.

PMID: 34339555 PMC: 9385210. DOI: 10.1002/da.23207.

References

Ellis B, Boyce W, Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, van IJzendoorn M . Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory. Dev Psychopathol. 2011; 23(1):7-28. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579410000611. View

Vuga M, Fox N, Cohn J, Kovacs M, George C . Long-term stability of electroencephalographic asymmetry and power in 3 to 9 year-old children. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007; 67(1):70-7. PMC: 2704384. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.007. View

Wallis J, Miller E . Neuronal activity in primate dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortex during performance of a reward preference task. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 18(7):2069-81. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02922.x. View

Fox N, HENDERSON H, Rubin K, Calkins S, Schmidt L . Continuity and discontinuity of behavioral inhibition and exuberance: psychophysiological and behavioral influences across the first four years of life. Child Dev. 2001; 72(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00262. View

Saby J, Marshall P . The utility of EEG band power analysis in the study of infancy and early childhood. Dev Neuropsychol. 2012; 37(3):253-73. PMC: 3347767. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2011.614663. View

Huffmeijer R, Alink L, Tops M, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, van IJzendoorn M . Asymmetric frontal brain activity and parental rejection predict altruistic behavior: moderation of oxytocin effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012; 12(2):382-92. PMC: 3341522. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0082-6. View

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I . The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001; 42(2):241-51. View

Peltola M, Leppanen J, Maki S, Hietanen J . Emergence of enhanced attention to fearful faces between 5 and 7 months of age. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009; 4(2):134-42. PMC: 2686224. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsn046. View

Gilissen R, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, van IJzendoorn M, van der Veer R . Parent-child relationship, temperament, and physiological reactions to fear-inducing film clips: further evidence for differential susceptibility. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007; 99(3):182-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.06.004. View

10.

Harmon-Jones E, Gable P, Peterson C . The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update. Biol Psychol. 2009; 84(3):451-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.010. View

11.

Laufs H, Krakow K, Sterzer P, Eger E, Beyerle A, Salek-Haddadi A . Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(19):11053-8. PMC: 196925. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1831638100. View

12.

Peltola M, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, Alink L, Huffmeijer R, Biro S, van IJzendoorn M . Resting frontal EEG asymmetry in children: meta-analyses of the effects of psychosocial risk factors and associations with internalizing and externalizing behavior. Dev Psychobiol. 2014; 56(6):1377-89. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21223. View

13.

Davidson R . What does the prefrontal cortex "do" in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biol Psychol. 2004; 67(1-2):219-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008. View

14.

Novak G, Kurtzberg D, Kreuzer J, Vaughan Jr H . Cortical responses to speech sounds and their formants in normal infants: maturational sequence and spatiotemporal analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989; 73(4):295-305. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90108-9. View

15.

Gao Y, Tuvblad C, Raine A, Lozano D, Baker L . Genetic and environmental influences on frontal EEG asymmetry and alpha power in 9-10-year-old twins. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46(4):787-96. PMC: 2706930. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00815.x. View

16.

Feldman R, Eidelman A, Rotenberg N . Parenting stress, infant emotion regulation, maternal sensitivity, and the cognitive development of triplets: a model for parent and child influences in a unique ecology. Child Dev. 2004; 75(6):1774-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00816.x. View

17.

Scourfield J, Martin N, Lewis G, McGuffin P . Heritability of social cognitive skills in children and adolescents. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 175:559-64. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.175.6.559. View

18.

Howarth G, Fettig N, Curby T, Bell M . Frontal Electroencephalogram Asymmetry and Temperament Across Infancy and Early Childhood: An Exploration of Stability and Bidirectional Relations. Child Dev. 2015; 87(2):465-76. PMC: 4809768. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12466. View

19.

Stets M, Stahl D, Reid V . A meta-analysis investigating factors underlying attrition rates in infant ERP studies. Dev Neuropsychol. 2012; 37(3):226-52. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2012.654867. View

20.

Bakermans-Kranenburg M, van IJzendoorn M, Juffer F . Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(2):195-215. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195. View