» Articles » PMID: 22246695

Asymmetric Frontal Brain Activity and Parental Rejection Predict Altruistic Behavior: Moderation of Oxytocin Effects

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jan 17
PMID 22246695
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Asymmetric frontal brain activity has been widely implicated in reactions to emotional stimuli and is thought to reflect individual differences in approach-withdrawal motivation. Here, we investigate whether asymmetric frontal activity, as a measure of approach-withdrawal motivation, also predicts charitable donations after a charity's (emotion-eliciting) promotional video showing a child in need is viewed, in a sample of 47 young adult women. In addition, we explore possibilities for mediation and moderation, by asymmetric frontal activity, of the effects of intranasally administered oxytocin and parental love withdrawal on charitable donations. Greater relative left frontal activity was related to larger donations. In addition, we found evidence of moderation: Low levels of parental love withdrawal predicted larger donations in the oxytocin condition for participants showing greater relative right frontal activity. We suggest that when approach motivation is high (reflected in greater relative left frontal activity), individuals are generally inclined to take action upon seeing someone in need and, thus, to donate money to actively help out. Only when approach motivation is low (reflected in less relative left/greater relative right activity) do empathic concerns affected by oxytocin and experiences of love withdrawal play an important part in deciding about donations.

Citing Articles

Neurophysiological effects of altruistically motivated craft activities in occupational therapy: A pilot study using frontal EEG and heart rate variability analysis.

Orui J, Shiraiwa K, Inoue T, Ueda M, Ueno K, Naito Y Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2025; :15691861251319466.

PMID: 39975471 PMC: 11833797. DOI: 10.1177/15691861251319466.


Intranasal oxytocin enhances approach-related EEG frontal alpha asymmetry during engagement of direct eye contact.

Soriano J, Daniels N, Prinsen J, Alaerts K Brain Commun. 2020; 2(2):fcaa093.

PMID: 32954338 PMC: 7475692. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa093.


Maternal intrusiveness predicts infants' event-related potential responses to angry and happy prosody independent of infant frontal asymmetry.

Huffmeijer R, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, Gervain J Infancy. 2020; 25(3):246-263.

PMID: 32362788 PMC: 7188314. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12327.


Perceptual Broadening Leads to More Prosociality.

Mukherjee S, Srinivasan N, Kumar N, Manjaly J Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1821.

PMID: 30319514 PMC: 6167552. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01821.


Disrupting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by rTMS reduces the P300 based marker of deception.

Karton I, Bachmann T Brain Behav. 2017; 7(4):e00656.

PMID: 28413707 PMC: 5390839. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.656.


References
1.
van IJzendoorn M, Huffmeijer R, Alink L, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, Tops M . The Impact of Oxytocin Administration on Charitable Donating is Moderated by Experiences of Parental Love-Withdrawal. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:258. PMC: 3195271. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00258. View

2.
Domes G, Lischke A, Berger C, Grossmann A, Hauenstein K, Heinrichs M . Effects of intranasal oxytocin on emotional face processing in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009; 35(1):83-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.06.016. View

3.
Davidson R . What does the prefrontal cortex "do" in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biol Psychol. 2004; 67(1-2):219-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008. View

4.
Cook I, OHara R, Uijtdehaage S, Mandelkern M, Leuchter A . Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 107(6):408-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00092-3. View

5.
Demaree H, Everhart D, Youngstrom E, Harrison D . Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating "dominance". Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005; 4(1):3-20. DOI: 10.1177/1534582305276837. View