» Articles » PMID: 32282790

Humans Adapt Their Anticipatory Eye Movements to the Volatility of Visual Motion Properties

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Apr 14
PMID 32282790
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal behavior constantly adapts to changes, for example when the statistical properties of the environment change unexpectedly. For an agent that interacts with this volatile setting, it is important to react accurately and as quickly as possible. It has already been shown that when a random sequence of motion ramps of a visual target is biased to one direction (e.g. right or left), human observers adapt their eye movements to accurately anticipate the target's expected direction. Here, we prove that this ability extends to a volatile environment where the probability bias could change at random switching times. In addition, we also recorded the explicit prediction of the next outcome as reported by observers using a rating scale. Both results were compared to the estimates of a probabilistic agent that is optimal in relation to the assumed generative model. Compared to the classical leaky integrator model, we found a better match between our probabilistic agent and the behavioral responses, both for the anticipatory eye movements and the explicit task. Furthermore, by controlling the level of preference between exploitation and exploration in the model, we were able to fit for each individual's experimental dataset the most likely level of volatility and analyze inter-individual variability across participants. These results prove that in such an unstable environment, human observers can still represent an internal belief about the environmental contingencies, and use this representation both for sensory-motor control and for explicit judgments. This work offers an innovative approach to more generically test the diversity of human cognitive abilities in uncertain and dynamic environments.

Citing Articles

Reduced latency in manual interception with anticipatory smooth eye movements.

Miyamoto T, Numasawa K, Hirano R, Yoshimura Y, Ono S iScience. 2025; 28(2):111849.

PMID: 39967873 PMC: 11834127. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111849.


Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: The role of target speed and acceleration.

Carneiro Morita V, Souto D, Masson G, Montagnini A J Vis. 2025; 25(1):2.

PMID: 39752177 PMC: 11702788. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.1.2.


Early Eye Disengagement Is Regulated by Task Complexity and Task Repetition in Visual Tracking Task.

Wu Y, Zhang Z, Aghazadeh F, Zheng B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793839 PMC: 11125091. DOI: 10.3390/s24102984.


Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech.

Gehmacher Q, Schubert J, Schmidt F, Hartmann T, Reisinger P, Rosch S Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3692.

PMID: 38693186 PMC: 11063150. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48126-2.


Precise Spiking Motifs in Neurobiological and Neuromorphic Data.

Grimaldi A, Gruel A, Besnainou C, Jeremie J, Martinet J, Perrinet L Brain Sci. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36672049 PMC: 9856822. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010068.


References
1.
Meyniel F, Schlunegger D, Dehaene S . The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(6):e1004305. PMC: 4468157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004305. View

2.
Cho R, Nystrom L, Brown E, Jones A, Braver T, Holmes P . Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 2(4):283-99. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.2.4.283. View

3.
Kowler E . Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit. Vision Res. 1989; 29(9):1049-57. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90052-7. View

4.
Mathys C, Daunizeau J, Friston K, Stephan K . A bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:39. PMC: 3096853. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039. View

5.
Yu A, Cohen J . Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior?. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015; 21:1873-1880. PMC: 4580342. View