Influence of Socioeconomic Status on the Referral Process to Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2020 Apr 12

PMID 32276957

Citations 7

Authors

Christina Boesgaard Graversen

Martin Berg Johansen

Regina Eichhorst

Soren Paaske Johnsen

Sam Riahi

Teresa Holmberg

Mogens Lytken Larsen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate in CR, (3) and assigned CR setting.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Department of Cardiology at a Danish University Hospital from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014.

Participants: A total of 1229 patients assessed for CR during hospitalisation with ACS were prospectively registered in the Rehab-North Register from 2011 to 2014. SES was assessed using data from national registers, concerning: personal income, occupational status, educational level and civil status. Patients were excluded if one of the following criteria was fulfilled: (1) missing data on SES, or (2) acceptable reason for not informing patients about CR (treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting, transfer to another hospital, still under treatment or death).

Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes were defined by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate, and (3) assigned CR setting (in-hospital/community centre) after ACS.

Results: A total of 854 (69.5 %) patients were referred to CR. After adjustment for age, gender, ACS diagnosis (ST-elevated myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris) and comorbidity, high income had the strongest association of referral to CR in all three phases (informed about CR: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.64; willingness to participate in CR: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.35; assigned in-hospital CR: OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.36). Educational level showed similar tendencies, however not statistically significant. The results did not vary according to gender.

Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the referral process to CR using a three-phase structure. It suggests income and education to influence all phases in the referral process to CR after ACS.

Citing Articles

The Accessibility and Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Kim C, Song J, Kim S Ann Rehabil Med. 2024; 48(4):249-258.

PMID: 39074836 PMC: 11372283. DOI: 10.5535/arm.240021.

Clinical effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation and barriers to completion in patients of low socioeconomic status in rural areas: A mixed-methods study.

Beleigoli A, Dafny H, Pinero de Plaza M, Hutchinson C, Marin T, Ramos J Clin Rehabil. 2024; 38(6):837-854.

PMID: 38631370 PMC: 11059835. DOI: 10.1177/02692155241236998.

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.

Wasilewski M, Vijayakumar A, Szigeti Z, Sathakaran S, Wang K, Saporta A J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:2361-2376.

PMID: 37605772 PMC: 10440091. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S418803.

Referral rate of chronic kidney disease patients to a nephrologist in the Region of Southern Denmark: results from KidDiCo.

Kampmann J, Heaf J, Mogensen C, Mickley H, Wolff D, Brandt F Clin Kidney J. 2022; 15(11):2116-2123.

PMID: 36325011 PMC: 9613423. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac165.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation: Effect Modification by Household Income.

Garfein J, Guhl E, Swabe G, Sekikawa A, Barinas-Mitchell E, Forman D J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(13):e025591.

PMID: 35730601 PMC: 9333381. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025591.

References

Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R, Vagero D . Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(9):804-10. PMC: 2566032. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.041319. View

Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson D, Zwisler A, Rees K, Martin N . Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. View

Neubeck L, Freedman S, Clark A, Briffa T, Bauman A, Redfern J . Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19(3):494-503. DOI: 10.1177/1741826711409326. View

Colbert J, Martin B, Haykowsky M, Hauer T, Austford L, Arena R . Cardiac rehabilitation referral, attendance and mortality in women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 22(8):979-86. DOI: 10.1177/2047487314545279. View

Sumner J, Grace S, Doherty P . Predictors of Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization in England: Results From the National Audit. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(10). PMC: 5121492. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003903. View

Ohm J, Skoglund P, Discacciati A, Sundstrom J, Hambraeus K, Jernberg T . Socioeconomic status predicts second cardiovascular event in 29,226 survivors of a first myocardial infarction. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018; 25(9):985-993. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318766646. View

Meillier L, Melgaard Nielsen K, Breinholt Larsen F, Larsen M . Socially differentiated cardiac rehabilitation: can we improve referral, attendance and adherence among patients with first myocardial infarction?. Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40(3):286-93. DOI: 10.1177/1403494812443600. View

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4):344-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. View

Jensen V, Rasmussen A . Danish Education Registers. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(7 Suppl):91-4. DOI: 10.1177/1403494810394715. View

10.

Pedersen C . The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(7 Suppl):22-5. DOI: 10.1177/1403494810387965. View

11.

Brown T, Hernandez A, Bittner V, Cannon C, Ellrodt G, Liang L . Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(6):515-21. PMC: 2760436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.080. View

12.

Nielsen K, Faergeman O, Foldspang A, Larsen M . Cardiac rehabilitation: health characteristics and socio-economic status among those who do not attend. Eur J Public Health. 2008; 18(5):479-83. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn060. View

13.

Mackenbach J . Nordic paradox, Southern miracle, Eastern disaster: persistence of inequalities in mortality in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2017; 27(suppl_4):14-17. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx160. View

14.

Smith Jr S, Benjamin E, Bonow R, Braun L, Creager M, Franklin B . AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011; 124(22):2458-73. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d. View

15.

Madsen M, Davidsen M, Rasmussen S, Abildstrom S, Osler M . The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(2):124-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00591-7. View

16.

Piepoli M, Hoes A, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano A . 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by.... Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(29):2315-2381. PMC: 4986030. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. View

17.

Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Davey Smith G . Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 60(1):7-12. PMC: 2465546. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531. View

18.

Thygesen S, Christiansen C, Christensen S, Lash T, Sorensen H . The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11:83. PMC: 3125388. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83. View

19.

Havranek E, Mujahid M, Barr D, Blair I, Cohen M, Cruz-Flores S . Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 132(9):873-98. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228. View

20.

Rasmussen J, Rasmussen S, Gislason G, Buch P, Abildstrom S, Kober L . Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(4):351-6. PMC: 2566173. DOI: 10.1136/jech.200X.040972. View