» Articles » PMID: 35322681

Association of Socioeconomic Status With Outcomes and Care Quality in Patients Presenting With Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Setting of Universal Health Care Coverage

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess whether there are disparities in incidence rates, care, and outcomes for patients with chest pain attended by emergency medical services according to socioeconomic status (SES) in a universal health coverage setting. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a population-based cohort study of individually linked ambulance, emergency, hospital admission, and mortality data in the state of Victoria, Australia, from January 2015 to June 2019 that included 183 232 consecutive emergency medical services attendances for adults with nontraumatic chest pain (mean age 62 [SD 18] years; 51% women) and excluded out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Age-standardized incidence of chest pain was higher for patients residing in lower SES areas (lowest SES quintile 1595 versus highest SES quintile 760 per 100 000 person-years; <0.001). Patients of lower SES were less likely to attend metropolitan, private, or revascularization-capable hospitals and had greater comorbidities. In multivariable models adjusted for clinical characteristics and final diagnosis, lower SES quintiles were associated with increased risks of 30-day and long-term mortality, readmission for chest pain and acute coronary syndrome, lower acuity emergency department triage categorization, emergency department length of stay >4 hours, and emergency department or emergency medical services discharge without hospital admission and were inversely associated with use of prehospital ECGs and transfer to a revascularization-capable hospital for patients presenting to non-percutaneous coronary intervention centers. CONCLUSIONS In this study, lower SES was associated with a higher incidence of chest pain presentations to emergency medical services and differences in care and outcomes. These findings suggest that substantial disparities for socioeconomically disadvantaged chest pain cohorts exist, even in the setting of universal health care access.

Citing Articles

Emergency care knowledge, utilization, and barriers in Northern Tanzania: A community-based survey.

Shayo F, Zaccheus G, Sakita F, Hernandes T, Vissoci J, Gordee A PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025; 5(1):e0004032.

PMID: 39761293 PMC: 11703045. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004032.


Association of neighborhood-level disadvantage beyond individual sociodemographic factors in patients with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis.

Peoples J, Tanner J, Bartley E, Domenico L, Gonzalez C, Cardoso J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):887.

PMID: 39511529 PMC: 11542459. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08007-7.


A health equity monitoring framework based on process mining.

Adams J, Ziegler J, McDermott M, Douglas M, Eber R, Wawira Gichoya J PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(8):e0000575.

PMID: 39196891 PMC: 11355534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000575.


A Comparative Analysis of Healthcare Quality Perception Among Different Vulnerable Populations with and without Telehealth Utilization: A Cross-Sectional Study from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Wang R, Lipin D, Swoboda T, Sambamoorthi U J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39102175 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02116-8.


Ambulance service recognition of health inequalities and activities for reduction: An evidence and gap map of the published literature.

Bell F, Crabtree R, Wilson C, Miller E, Byrne R Br Paramed J. 2024; 9(1):47-57.

PMID: 38946737 PMC: 11210581. DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.47.


References
1.
Niederseer D, Schmied C . Socioeconomic status matters: How can we individualize cardiac rehabilitation according to different socioeconomic needs?. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020; 28(5):510-512. DOI: 10.1177/2047487320931309. View

2.
Swancutt D, Joel-Edgar S, Allen M, Thomas D, Brant H, Benger J . Not all waits are equal: an exploratory investigation of emergency care patient pathways. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):436. PMC: 5482933. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2349-2. View

3.
Peterson E, Roe M, Rumsfeld J, Shaw R, Brindis R, Fonarow G . A call to ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous quality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2(5):491-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.847145. View

4.
Szummer K, Wallentin L, Lindhagen L, Alfredsson J, Erlinge D, Held C . Relations between implementation of new treatments and improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry 1995 to 2014. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(42):3766-3776. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy554. View

5.
Hamad R, Penko J, Kazi D, Coxson P, Guzman D, Wei P . Association of Low Socioeconomic Status With Premature Coronary Heart Disease in US Adults. JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5(8):899-908. PMC: 7254448. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1458. View