» Articles » PMID: 38631370

Clinical Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Barriers to Completion in Patients of Low Socioeconomic Status in Rural Areas: A Mixed-methods Study

Abstract

Objective: To investigate cardiac rehabilitation utilisation and effectiveness, factors, needs and barriers associated with non-completion.

Design: We used the mixed-methods design with concurrent triangulation of a retrospective cohort and a qualitative study.

Setting: Economically disadvantaged areas in rural Australia.

Participants: Patients (≥18 years) referred to cardiac rehabilitation through a central referral system and living in rural areas of low socioeconomic status.

Main Measures: A Cox survival model balanced by inverse probability weighting was used to assess the association between cardiac rehabilitation utilization and 12-month mortality/cardiovascular readmissions. Associations with non-completion were tested by logistic regression. Barriers and needs to cardiac rehabilitation completion were investigated through a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups (n = 28).

Results: Among 16,159 eligible separations, 44.3% were referred, and 11.2% completed cardiac rehabilitation. Completing programme (HR 0.65; 95%CI 0.57-0.74; p < 0.001) led to a lower risk of cardiovascular readmission/death. Living alone (OR 1.38; 95%CI 1.00-1.89; p = 0.048), having diabetes (OR 1.48; 95%CI 1.02-2.13; p = 0.037), or having depression (OR 1.54; 95%CI 1.14-2.08; p = 0.005), were associated with a higher risk of non-completion whereas enrolment in a telehealth programme was associated with a lower risk of non-completion (OR 0.26; 95%CI 0.18-0.38; p < 0.001). Themes related to logistic issues, social support, transition of care challenges, lack of care integration, and of person-centeredness emerged as barriers to completion.

Conclusions: Cardiac rehabilitation completion was low but effective in reducing mortality/cardiovascular readmissions. Understanding and addressing barriers and needs through mixed methods can help tailor cardiac rehabilitation programmes to vulnerable populations and improve completion and outcomes.

References
1.
Lemstra M, Alsabbagh W, Rajakumar R, Rogers M, Blackburn D . Neighbourhood income and cardiac rehabilitation access as determinants of nonattendance and noncompletion. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 29(12):1599-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.08.011. View

2.
Graversen C, Johansen M, Eichhorst R, Johnsen S, Riahi S, Holmberg T . Influence of socioeconomic status on the referral process to cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(4):e036088. PMC: 7170636. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036088. View

3.
Hald K, Melgaard Nielsen K, Nielsen C, Meillier L, Breinholt Larsen F, Christensen B . Expanded cardiac rehabilitation in socially vulnerable patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up study focusing on mortality and non-fatal events. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1):e019307. PMC: 5786137. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019307. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Chung S, Candelaria D, Gallagher R . Women's Health-Related Quality of Life Substantially Improves With Tailored Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022; 42(4):217-226. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000692. View