Deciphering the Metabolic Pathway Difference Between and by Comparative Proteomics and Metabonomics
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Butenyl-spinosyn, a secondary metabolite produced by , exhibits strong insecticidal activity than spinosyn. However, the low synthesis capacity and unknown metabolic characteristics of butenyl-spinosyn in wild-type limit its broad application and metabolic engineering. Here, we showed that exhibited increased glucose consumption ability and growth rate compared with , but the production of butenyl-spinosyn was much lower than that of spinosyn. To further elucidate the metabolic mechanism of these different phenotypes, we performed a comparative proteomic and metabolomic study on and to identify the change in the abundance levels of proteins and metabolites. We found that the abundance of most proteins and metabolites associated with glucose transport, fatty acid metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle, amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, purine and pyrimidine metabolism, and target product biosynthesis in was higher than that in . However, the overall abundance of proteins involved in butenyl-spinosyn biosynthesis was much lower than that of the high-abundance protein chaperonin GroEL, such as the enzymes related to rhamnose synthesis. We speculated that these protein and metabolite abundance changes may be directly responsible for the above phenotypic changes in and , especially affecting butenyl-spinosyn biosynthesis. Further studies revealed that the over-expression of the rhamnose synthetic genes and methionine adenosyltransferase gene could effectively improve the production of butenyl-spinosyn by 2.69- and 3.03-fold, respectively, confirming the reliability of this conjecture. This work presents the first comparative proteomics and metabolomics study of and , providing new insights into the novel links of phenotypic change and metabolic difference between two strains. The result will be valuable in designing strategies to promote the biosynthesis of butenyl-spinosyn by metabolic engineering.
Li X, Wang J, Su C, Guo C, Xu Z, Wang K Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 109(1):14.
PMID: 39836216 PMC: 11750948. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-024-13390-1.
Heterologous activation and metabolites identification of the gene cluster from .
Tang H, Yang X, Wang W, Cui X, Wei W, Wu J Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2024; 9(4):828-833.
PMID: 39099750 PMC: 11295457. DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.05.004.
Zhao X, Hussain M, Mohsin A, Liu Z, Xu Z, Li Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 11:1329859.
PMID: 38292303 PMC: 10825966. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1329859.
Diab M, Mead H, Khedr M, Nafie M, Abu-Elsaoud A, Hanora A AMB Express. 2023; 13(1):47.
PMID: 37184816 PMC: 10185727. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-023-01550-x.
Metabolomic profiles of the liquid state fermentation in co-culture of and .
Wang Y, Chen Y, Xin J, Chen X, Xu T, He J Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1080743.
PMID: 36778878 PMC: 9909110. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1080743.