Human Dermal Fibroblast Viability and Adhesion on Cellulose Nanomaterial Coatings: Influence of Surface Characteristics

Overview

Journal Biomacromolecules

Publisher American Chemical Society

Specialties Biochemistry
Biology
Molecular Biology

Date 2020 Mar 10

PMID 32150393

Citations 8

Authors

Ruut Kummala

Diosangeles Soto Veliz

Zhiqiang Fang

Wenyang Xu

Tiffany Abitbol

Chunlin Xu

Martti Toivakka

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Biodegradable and renewable materials, such as cellulose nanomaterials, have been studied as a replacement material for traditional plastics in the biomedical field. Furthermore, in chronic wound care, modern wound dressings, hydrogels, and active synthetic extracellular matrices promoting tissue regeneration are developed to guide cell growth and differentiation. Cells are guided not only by chemical cues but also through their interaction with the surrounding substrate and its physicochemical properties. Hence, the current work investigated plant-based cellulose nanomaterials and their surface characteristic effects on human dermal fibroblast (HDF) behavior. Four thin cellulose nanomaterial-based coatings produced from microfibrillar cellulose (MFC), cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), and two TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (CNF) with different total surface charge were characterized, and HDF viability and adhesion were evaluated. The highest viability and most stable adhesion were on the anionic CNF coating with a surface charge of 1.14 mmol/g. On MFC and CNC coated surfaces, HDFs sedimented but were unable to anchor to the substrate, leading to low viability.

Citing Articles

Preparation and Characterization of Polymeric Microparticles Based on Poly(ethylene brassylate-co-squaric Acid) Loaded with Norfloxacin.

Serban A, Nacu I, Rosca I, Ghilan A, Rusu A, Nita L Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38675211 PMC: 11053867. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040550.

Antiadhesive Hyaluronic Acid-Based Wound Dressings Promote Wound Healing by Preventing Re-Injury: An In Vivo Investigation.

Kim D, Seong K, Lee H, Kim M, An S, Jeong J Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38540123 PMC: 10968420. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030510.

Preparation and Characterization of Softwood and Hardwood Nanofibril Hydrogels: Toward Wound Dressing Applications.

Bas Y, Berglund L, Niittyla T, Zattarin E, Aili D, Sotra Z Biomacromolecules. 2023; 24(12):5605-5619.

PMID: 37950687 PMC: 10716857. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00596.

Cell Surface Charge Mapping Using a Microelectrode Array on ITO Substrate.

Ouyang L, Shaik R, Xu R, Zhang G, Zhe J Cells. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36831185 PMC: 9954061. DOI: 10.3390/cells12040518.

Wool Keratin Nanoparticle-Based Micropatterns for Cellular Guidance Applications.

Trojanowska D, Suarato G, Braccia C, Armirotti A, Fiorentini F, Athanassiou A ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2022; 5(10):15272-15287.

PMID: 36338329 PMC: 9624257. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03116.

References

Rueden C, Schindelin J, Hiner M, DeZonia B, Walter A, Arena E . ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017; 18(1):529. PMC: 5708080. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. View

Rosqvist E, Niemela E, Venu A, Kummala R, Ihalainen P, Toivakka M . Human dermal fibroblast proliferation controlled by surface roughness of two-component nanostructured latex polymer coatings. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018; 174:136-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.064. View

Abitbol T, Rivkin A, Cao Y, Nevo Y, Abraham E, Ben-Shalom T . Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016; 39:76-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.002. View

Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D . Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011; 50(24):5438-66. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001273. View

Nordli H, Chinga-Carrasco G, Rokstad A, Pukstad B . Producing ultrapure wood cellulose nanofibrils and evaluating the cytotoxicity using human skin cells. Carbohydr Polym. 2016; 150:65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.094. View

Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martinez Avila H, Hagg D, Gatenholm P . 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromolecules. 2015; 16(5):1489-96. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188. View

Imlimthan S, Otaru S, Keinanen O, Correia A, Lintinen K, Santos H . Radiolabeled Molecular Imaging Probes for the In Vivo Evaluation of Cellulose Nanocrystals for Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules. 2018; 20(2):674-683. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01313. View

Hong S, Ergezen E, Lec R, Barbee K . Real-time analysis of cell-surface adhesive interactions using thickness shear mode resonator. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(34):5813-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.031. View

Mahmoud K, Mena J, Male K, Hrapovic S, Kamen A, Luong J . Effect of surface charge on the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of fluorescent labeled cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2010; 2(10):2924-32. DOI: 10.1021/am1006222. View

10.

Basu A, Heitz K, Stromme M, Welch K, Ferraz N . Ion-crosslinked wood-derived nanocellulose hydrogels with tunable antibacterial properties: Candidate materials for advanced wound care applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 181:345-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.085. View

11.

Domingues R, Silva M, Gershovich P, Betta S, Babo P, Caridade S . Development of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid/Cellulose Nanocrystals Bionanocomposite Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Bioconjug Chem. 2015; 26(8):1571-81. DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00209. View

12.

Metwally S, Stachewicz U . Surface potential and charges impact on cell responses on biomaterials interfaces for medical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019; 104:109883. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109883. View

13.

Mayet N, Choonara Y, Kumar P, Tomar L, Tyagi C, du Toit L . A comprehensive review of advanced biopolymeric wound healing systems. J Pharm Sci. 2014; 103(8):2211-30. DOI: 10.1002/jps.24068. View

14.

Hakkarainen T, Koivuniemi R, Kosonen M, Escobedo-Lucea C, Sanz-Garcia A, Vuola J . Nanofibrillar cellulose wound dressing in skin graft donor site treatment. J Control Release. 2016; 244(Pt B):292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.053. View

15.

Moon R, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J . Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011; 40(7):3941-94. DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00108b. View

16.

Caliari S, Burdick J . A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(5):405-14. PMC: 5800304. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3839. View

17.

Chen H, Cohen D, Choudhury D, Kioka N, Craig S . Spatial distribution and functional significance of activated vinculin in living cells. J Cell Biol. 2005; 169(3):459-70. PMC: 2171941. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200410100. View

18.

Basu A, Lindh J, Alander E, Stromme M, Ferraz N . On the use of ion-crosslinked nanocellulose hydrogels for wound healing solutions: Physicochemical properties and application-oriented biocompatibility studies. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 174:299-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.073. View

19.

Khalili A, Ahmad M . A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(8):18149-84. PMC: 4581240. DOI: 10.3390/ijms160818149. View

20.

Halib N, Perrone F, Cemazar M, Dapas B, Farra R, Abrami M . Potential Applications of Nanocellulose-Containing Materials in the Biomedical Field. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10(8). PMC: 5578343. DOI: 10.3390/ma10080977. View