» Articles » PMID: 32117069

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Cancer With Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core-Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Mar 3
PMID 32117069
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing thyroid cancer. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved up to May 2019, and the overall accuracy of FNA and CNB in diagnosing thyroid cancer was evaluated by meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was estimated, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Ten eligible studies, involving 10,078 patients with 10,842 thyroid nodules, were included. The overall sensitivity and specificity of FNA and CNB for thyroid cancer were 0.72 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.74], 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), respectively. Other parameters used to assess efficacy included PLR 41.71 (2.15-808.27) and 51.56 (3.20-841.47), NLR 0.31 (0.22-0.42) and 0.22 (0.15-0.32), for FNA and CNB, respectively. Overall, the pooled summary ROC (AUC) value of FNA and CNB was 0.9025 and 0.7926, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two AUCs of FNA and CNB ( = 0.164). FNA and CNB are still similar as first-line diagnostic tools. FNA remains a good first-line method for detecting thyroid malignancies.

Citing Articles

Integrated intraoperative predictive model for malignancy risk assessment of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance cytology.

Li C, Luo Y, Jiang Y, Li Q Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1860.

PMID: 39805960 PMC: 11730291. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84716-2.


Core needle biopsy: an efficacious adjunct to cytological diagnosis in thyroid tumours suspected of anaplastic carcinoma - single-centre experience.

Bakula-Zalewska E, Kwapisz M, Goralski P, Dlugosinska J, Galczynski J, Dedecjus M Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2024; 28(2):167-171.

PMID: 39421712 PMC: 11480912. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2024.142468.


Role of ultrasound‑guided fine‑needle aspiration cytology combined with thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin antibodies in evaluating cervical lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer.

Weng L Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(5):512.

PMID: 39268165 PMC: 11391521. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14645.


Minimally invasive biopsy-based diagnostics in support of precision cancer medicine.

Franzen B, Auer G, Lewensohn R Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(11):2612-2628.

PMID: 38519839 PMC: 11547246. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13640.


A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and repeat fine needle aspiration in patients with inconclusive initial cytology of thyroid nodules.

Su X, Yue C, Yang W, Ma B Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1309005.

PMID: 38356956 PMC: 10865505. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1309005.


References
1.
Choi Y, Baek J, Suh C, Shim W, Jeong B, Kim J . Core-needle biopsy versus repeat fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules initially read as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance. Head Neck. 2016; 39(2):361-369. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24597. View

2.
Renshaw A, Pinnar N . Comparison of thyroid fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007; 128(3):370-4. DOI: 10.1309/07TL3V58337TXHMC. View

3.
Ahn S, Park S, Choi S . Comparison of Consecutive Results from Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules. Endocr Pathol. 2017; 28(4):332-338. DOI: 10.1007/s12022-017-9496-1. View

4.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

5.
Hong M, Na D, Kim S, Kim D . Role of core needle biopsy as a first-line diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules: a retrospective cohort study. Ultrasonography. 2017; 37(3):244-253. PMC: 6044216. DOI: 10.14366/usg.17041. View