» Articles » PMID: 38356956

A Comparative Analysis of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients with Inconclusive Initial Cytology of Thyroid Nodules

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Feb 15
PMID 38356956
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in comparison to repeat fine-needle aspiration(rFNA) for thyroid nodules that yield inconclusive results following the initial fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Methods: A cohort of 471 patients who received an inconclusive cytological diagnosis following the initial FNA were included in this study. These patients subsequently underwent either CNB (n=242) or rFNA (n=229). The inconclusive FNA results encompassed categories I, III, and IV of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology(TBSRTC), as well as the ultrasound images indicating malignancy despite FNA results falling under TBSRTC category II. This study assessed the sampling satisfaction rate, diagnostic efficacy, and complications associated with CNB compared to rFNA. Additionally, the impact of repeat puncture time and nodule size on diagnostic efficacy was analyzed.

Results: Following repeat punctures, the satisfaction rate of the CNB sampling was found to be significantly higher than that of rFNA (83.9% vs 66.8%). The diagnostic rate in the CNB group was significantly greater compared to that of the rFNA group (70.7% vs 35.8%). In patients with nodule maximum diameters ranging from 5 mm to 20 mm, the diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CNB group compared to that in the rFNA group. In patients with intervals less than 90 days, between 90 days and one year, the diagnostic rate in the CNB group was found to be higher compared to that in the rFNA group. In CNB, not immediately adjacent to the capsule was a risk factor for nodular puncture bleeding (37.0% vs 22.7%.).

Conclusion: CNB demonstrated higher rates of satisfaction and diagnosis compared to the rFNA. The diagnostic effectiveness of CNB was not influenced by the time interval or the size of the thyroid nodule. Therefore, in cases where the initial FNA diagnosis of thyroid nodules is inconclusive, CNB should be considered as a viable option for re-puncture.

References
1.
Jung S, Koo H, Jang K, Chung M, Song C, Ji Y . Comparison of core-needle biopsy and repeat fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules with inconclusive initial cytology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 278(8):3019-3025. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06473-y. View

2.
Kim S, Lee H, Moon J, Kim E, Moon H, Yoon J . Fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy for diagnosis of thyroid malignancy and neoplasm: a matched cohort study. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(2):801-811. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4424-1. View

3.
Kouba E, Ford A, Brown C, Yeh C, Siegal G, Manne U . Detection of BRAF V600E Mutations With Next-Generation Sequencing in Infarcted Thyroid Carcinomas After Fine-Needle Aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018; 150(2):177-185. PMC: 8482970. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy045. View

4.
Lee H, Kim Y, Han H, Seo J, Hwang C, Kim K . Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of large thyroid nodules: Core needle biopsy yields more reliable results than fine needle aspiration. J Clin Ultrasound. 2019; 47(5):255-260. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22721. View

5.
Ha E, Lim H, Yoon J, Baek J, Do K, Choi M . Primary Imaging Test and Appropriate Biopsy Methods for Thyroid Nodules: Guidelines by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Korean J Radiol. 2018; 19(4):623-631. PMC: 6005947. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.623. View