» Articles » PMID: 32065306

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Fistula Laser Closure

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 18
PMID 32065306
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Fistula laser closure (FiLaC) is a novel sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the FiLaC procedure.

Methods: Databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for articles assessing FiLaC. All studies including case series and comparative studies reporting the outcome of FiLaC in the treatment of fistula-in-ano were considered eligible. The main outcomes were healing rates of fistula laser closure, postoperative complications including incontinence, technical aspects of the procedure and failure of healing.

Results: Seven studies were included. There were a total of 454 patients, 69.1% with a transsphincteric fistula-in-ano and 35% with recurrent disease. The median age of the patients was 43 years (range 18-83 years). The median operation time was 18.3 min (range 6-32 min). With a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the weighed mean rate of primary healing was 67.3% and the overall success when FiLaC was reused was 69.7%. The weighted mean rate of complications was 4%, all of them were minor complications and the weighted mean rate of continence affection was 1% in the form of minor soiling.

Conclusions: FiLaC may be considered an effective and safe sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano with an acceptable, low, complication rate. However, well-designed randomized control trials comparing FiLaC with other techniques are required to substantiate the promising outcomes reported in this review.

Citing Articles

Surgical Management of Perianal Crohn's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Busbait S Acta Inform Med. 2025; 32(3-4):215-220.

PMID: 40061009 PMC: 11889424. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2024.32.215-220.


Total fistula volume predicts surgical outcomes in complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease following fistula-tract laser closure: a single-center retrospective study.

Cao D, Wang X, Zhang Y, Qian K, Yang N, Zhu M Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):70.

PMID: 39961900 PMC: 11832601. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03094-z.


Understanding the anatomical basis of anorectal fistulas and their surgical management: exploring different types for enhanced precision and safety.

Almughamsi A, Elhassan Y Surg Today. 2025; .

PMID: 39888400 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-025-02995-2.


Toward less invasive coloproctology: The future is out there.

Emile S, Ragheb J World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(3):199-203.

PMID: 38314131 PMC: 10835533. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i3.199.


Laser interventions in coloproctology. A plea for standardized treatment protocols.

Ambe P Tech Coloproctol. 2023; 27(10):953-955.

PMID: 37639034 PMC: 10485080. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02859-2.


References
1.
Emile S, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A . A Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(4):2084-2093. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5905-2. View

2.
Ozturk E, Gulcu B . Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57(3):360-4. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000067. View

3.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2700. PMC: 2714672. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. View

4.
Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M . Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol. 2015; 19(8):449-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1282-9. View

5.
Chand M, Tozer P, Cohen R . Is FiLaC the answer for more complex perianal fistula?. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21(4):253-255. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1621-0. View