» Articles » PMID: 33860363

Management of Cryptoglandular Fistula-in-ano Among Gastrointestinal Surgeons in the Netherlands

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 16
PMID 33860363
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano (FIA) can be challenging. Despite Dutch and international guidelines determining optimal therapy is still quite difficult. The aim of this study was to report current practices in the management of cryptoglandular FIA among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.

Methods: Dutch surgeons and residents who are treating FIA regularly were sent a survey invitation by email. The survey was available online from September 19 to December 1 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions concerning diagnostic and surgical techniques in the treatment of intersphincteric and transsphincteric FIA.

Results: In total, 147 (43%) surgeons responded and completed the survey. Magnetic resonance imaging was the preferred diagnostic imaging modality (97%) followed by the endo-anal ultrasound (12%). In case of a high FIA, 86% used a non-cutting seton. Most respondents removed a seton between 6 weeks and 3 months (n = 84, 58%). Fistulotomy was the procedure of preference in low transsphincteric (86%) and low intersphincteric FIA (92%). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), with 78% and 46%, respectively, were the procedures that were applied most often in high transsphincteric FIA. In high intersphincteric FIA 67% performed a MAF and 33% a fistulotomy. Thirty-three percent of all respondents stated that they habitually closed the internal fistula opening, half of them used a Z-plasty. For debridement of the fistula tract the preferred method was curettage (78%).

Conclusions: Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons use various techniques in the management of FIA. Novel promising techniques should be investigated adequately in sufficient large trials to increase consensus. A core outcome measurement and a prospective international database would help in comparing results. Until then, treatment should be adjusted to the individual patient, governed by fistula characteristics and patient choice.

Citing Articles

Mucosal advancement flap versus ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract for management of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas in the elderly: a retrospective study.

Habeeb T, Chiaretti M, Kryvoruchko I, Pesce A, Kechagias A, Elias A Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025; 40(1):61.

PMID: 40072575 PMC: 11903622. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-04846-5.


Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas.

Garg P, Ladukar L, Yagnik V, Bhattacharya K, Kaur G Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:97-108.

PMID: 38646156 PMC: 11032160. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S456855.


Treatment of pediatric fistula-in-ano-Sphincter-sparing non-cutting seton placement as the future treatment of choice?.

Besendorfer M, Langer L, Carbon R, Weiss C, Muller H, Diez S Front Surg. 2023; 10:1144425.

PMID: 37114148 PMC: 10126327. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1144425.


Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease?.

Dekker L, Han-Geurts I, Grossi U, Gallo G, Veldkamp R Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26(5):387-392.

PMID: 35141793 PMC: 9018630. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02591-3.


Guidelines on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistula: Experience from 2404 scans.

Garg P, Kaur B, Yagnik V, Dawka S, Menon G World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27(33):5460-5473.

PMID: 34588745 PMC: 8433608. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i33.5460.

References
1.
Litta F, Parello A, De Simone V, Grossi U, Orefice R, Ratto C . Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction. Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23(10):993-1001. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02093-9. View

2.
Verkade C, Zimmerman D, Wasowicz D, Polle S, de Vries H . Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton. Tech Coloproctol. 2020; 24(10):1043-1046. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02254-1. View

3.
Gottgens K, Janssen P, Heemskerk J, van Dielen F, Konsten J, Lettinga T . Long-term outcome of low perianal fistulas treated by fistulotomy: a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 30(2):213-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2072-y. View

4.
Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Emile S, Sakr A, Mikael M, Lundby L . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of fistula laser closure. Tech Coloproctol. 2020; 24(4):265-274. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02165-1. View

5.
Ratto C, Grossi U, Litta F, Di Tanna G, Parello A, De Simone V . Contemporary surgical practice in the management of anal fistula: results from an international survey. Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23(8):729-741. PMC: 6736896. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02051-5. View