» Articles » PMID: 36911578

Surgery of Simple and Complex Anal Fistulae in Adults: A Review of the Literature for Optimal Surgical Outcomes

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Mar 13
PMID 36911578
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anal fistulas are common anorectal conditions, and surgery is the primary treatment option. In the last 20 years of literature, there exist a large number of surgical procedures, especially for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, as they present more recurrences and continence problems than simple anal fistulas. To date, there are no guidelines for choosing the best technique. We conducted a recent literature review, mainly the last 20 years, based on the PubMed and Google Scholar medical databases, with the goal of identifying the surgical procedures with the highest success rates, lowest recurrence rates, and best safety profiles. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, review articles, comparative studies, recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various surgical techniques, as well as the latest guidelines of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the German S3 guidelines on simple and complex fistulas were reviewed. According to the literature, there is no recommendation for the optimal surgical technique. The etiology, complexity, and many other factors affect the outcome. In simple intersphincteric anal fistulas, fistulotomy is the procedure of choice. In simple low transsphincteric fistulas, the patient's selection is crucial in order to perform a safe fistulotomy or another sphincter-saving technique. The healing rate in simple anal fistulas is higher than 95% with low recurrence and without significant postoperative complications. In complex anal fistulas, only sphincter-saving techniques should be used; the optimal outcomes are obtained by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) and rectal advancement flaps. Those techniques assure high healing rates of 60-90%. The novel technique of the transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) is under evaluation. The novel sphincter-saving techniques of fistula laser closure (FiLac) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are safe, with reported healing rates ranging from 65% to 90%. Surgeons should be familiar with all sphincter-saving techniques in order to face the variability of the fistulas-in-ano. Currently, there is no universally superior technique that can treat all fistulas.

Citing Articles

Understanding the anatomical basis of anorectal fistulas and their surgical management: exploring different types for enhanced precision and safety.

Almughamsi A, Elhassan Y Surg Today. 2025; .

PMID: 39888400 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-025-02995-2.


Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for fistula management: an overview of existing systematic reviews.

Tripathi T, Mohan S, Alfaifi H, Alfaifi H, Farasani A, R R Int J Surg. 2024; 110(12):7573-7584.

PMID: 39468970 PMC: 11634089. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002125.


Use of Non-Thermal Plasma as Postoperative Therapy in Anal Fistula: Clinical Experience and Results.

Lopez-Callejas R, Velasco-Garcia P, Betancourt-Angeles M, Rodriguez-Mendez B, Berrones-Stringel G, Jaramillo-Martinez C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200330 PMC: 11351551. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081866.


Comparative Evaluation Between Cutting of the Intersphincteric Space vs Cutting Seton in High Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Qin J, Wu Y, Zheng X, Wu K, Dai G, Tan Y J Am Coll Surg. 2024; 239(6):563-573.

PMID: 39166759 PMC: 11559975. DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001192.


Analysis of Ambulatory Proctologic Surgery for Simple Anal Fistulas in Terms of Recovery, Complications, Recurrence, and Cost.

Demir Sr H, Capoglu R, Yigit M, Harmantepe T, Gonullu E, Karaman K Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42110.

PMID: 37476300 PMC: 10354678. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42110.

References
1.
de Groof E, Sahami S, Lucas C, Ponsioen C, Bemelman W, Buskens C . Treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing seton drainage and anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18(7):667-75. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13311. View

2.
Schwartz D, Pemberton J, Sandborn W . Diagnosis and treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn disease. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135(10):906-18. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-10-200111200-00011. View

3.
Ho E, Rickard M, Suen M, Keshava A, Kwik C, Ong Y . Perianal sepsis: surgical perspective and practical MRI reporting for radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019; 44(5):1744-1755. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01920-9. View

4.
Gaertner W, Burgess P, Davids J, Lightner A, Shogan B, Sun M . The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal Fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022; 65(8):964-985. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002473. View

5.
Schwartz D, Wiersema M, Dudiak K, Fletcher J, Clain J, Tremaine W . A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121(5):1064-72. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.28676. View