» Articles » PMID: 32049691

A Universal Protocol for Abdominal CT Examinations Performed on a Photon-Counting Detector CT System: A Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal Invest Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Feb 13
PMID 32049691
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of using a universal abdominal acquisition protocol on a photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) system and to compare its performance to that of single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) CT using energy-integrating detectors (EIDs).

Methods: Iodine inserts of various concentrations and sizes were embedded into different sizes of adult abdominal phantoms. Phantoms were scanned on a research PCD-CT and a clinical EID-CT with SE and DE modes. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were generated from PCD-CT and DE mode of EID-CT. For each image type and phantom size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured for each iodine insert and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for iodine detectability was calculated using a channelized Hotelling observer. The optimal energy (in kiloelectrovolt) of VMIs was determined separately as the one with highest CNR and the one with the highest AUC. The PCD-CT VMIs at the optimal energy were then compared with DE VMIs and SE images in terms of CNR and AUC.

Results: Virtual monoenergetic image at 50 keV had both the highest CNR and highest AUC for PCD-CT and DECT. For 1.0 mg I/mL iodine and 35 cm phantom, the CNRs of 50 keV VMIs from PCD-CT (2.01 ± 0.67) and DE (1.96 ± 0.52) were significantly higher (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) than SE images (1.11 ± 0.35). The AUC of PCD-CT (0.98 ± 0.01) was comparable to SE (0.98 ± 0.01), and both were slightly lower than DE (0.99 ± 0.01, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A similar trend was observed for other phantom sizes and iodine concentrations.

Conclusions: Virtual monoenergetic images at a fixed energy from a universal acquisition protocol on PCD-CT demonstrated higher iodine CNR and comparable iodine detectability than SECT images, and similar performance compared with DE VMIs.

Citing Articles

Photon-counting detector computed tomography: iodine density versus virtual monoenergetic imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Alagic Z, Duran C, Suzuki C, Halldorsson K, Svensson-Marcial A, Saeter R Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39400586 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04605-0.


Low-contrast detectability of photon-counting-detector CT at different scan modes and image types in comparison with energy-integrating-detector CT.

Fan M, Zhou Z, Wellinghoff J, McCollough C, Yu L J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(Suppl 1):S12803.

PMID: 38799271 PMC: 11116128. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.S1.S12803.


Standardizing technical parameters and terms for abdominopelvic photon-counting CT: laying the groundwork for innovation and evidence sharing.

Leng S, Toia G, Hoodeshenas S, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Yagil Y, Maltz J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(9):3261-3273.

PMID: 38769199 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04342-4.


Task-based automatic keV selection: leveraging routine virtual monoenergetic imaging for dose reduction on clinical photon-counting detector CT.

Rajendran K, Bruesewitz M, Swicklik J, Ferrero A, Thorne J, Yu L Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(11).

PMID: 38648795 PMC: 11108732. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad41b3.


[A comprehensive review on photon-counting computed tomography: Principles, technical hurdles and analysis of clinical applications].

Zhang H, Li S, Liu Y, Lu H Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 40(5):1012-1018.

PMID: 37879932 PMC: 10600420. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202305015.


References
1.
Lee S, Kim S, Ahn S, Kang H, Kang J, Han J . Virtual monoenergetic dual-layer, dual-energy CT enterography: optimization of keV settings and its added value for Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(6):2525-2534. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5215-z. View

2.
Ascenti G, Mileto A, Krauss B, Gaeta M, Blandino A, Scribano E . Distinguishing enhancing from nonenhancing renal masses with dual-source dual-energy CT: iodine quantification versus standard enhancement measurements. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(8):2288-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2811-4. View

3.
Seyal A, Arslanoglu A, Abboud S, Sahin A, Horowitz J, Yaghmai V . CT of the Abdomen with Reduced Tube Voltage in Adults: A Practical Approach. Radiographics. 2015; 35(7):1922-39. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150048. View

4.
Yu L, Christner J, Leng S, Wang J, Fletcher J, McCollough C . Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. Med Phys. 2011; 38(12):6371-9. PMC: 3230639. DOI: 10.1118/1.3658568. View

5.
Li M, Feng S, Wu N, Zhang L . Scout-Based Automated Tube Potential Selection Technique (kV Assist) in Enhanced Chest Computed Tomography: Effects on Radiation Exposure and Image Quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016; 41(3):442-445. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000523. View