» Articles » PMID: 32041949

Near-field Sub-diffraction Photolithography with an Elastomeric Photomask

Abstract

Photolithography is the prevalent microfabrication technology. It needs to meet resolution and yield demands at a cost that makes it economically viable. However, conventional far-field photolithography has reached the diffraction limit, which imposes complex optics and short-wavelength beam source to achieve high resolution at the expense of cost efficiency. Here, we present a cost-effective near-field optical printing approach that uses metal patterns embedded in a flexible elastomer photomask with mechanical robustness. This technique generates sub-diffraction patterns that are smaller than 1/10 of the wavelength of the incoming light. It can be integrated into existing hardware and standard mercury lamp, and used for a variety of surfaces, such as curved, rough and defect surfaces. This method offers a higher resolution than common light-based printing systems, while enabling parallel-writing. We anticipate that it will be widely used in academic and industrial productions.

Citing Articles

Photonic crystal L3 cavity laser fabricated using maskless digital photolithography.

Kang M, Jin H, Jeon H Nanophotonics. 2024; 11(10):2283-2291.

PMID: 39678091 PMC: 11636002. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2022-0021.


Controlled Formation of Porous Cross-Bar Arrays Using Nano-Transfer Printing.

Kim Y, Kang E, Park T, Park W Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597432 PMC: 11595979. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225609.


Printable, stretchable metal-vapor-desorption layers for high-fidelity patterning in soft, freeform electronics.

Jeong S, Yoon H, Michalek L, Kim G, Kim J, Seo J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7209.

PMID: 39174549 PMC: 11341687. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51585-2.


Metasurface-Embedded Contact Lenses for Holographic Light Projection.

Ko J, Kim G, Kim I, Hwang S, Jeon S, Ahn J Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(38):e2407045.

PMID: 39120024 PMC: 11481215. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202407045.


Advances in lithographic techniques for precision nanostructure fabrication in biomedical applications.

Stokes K, Clark K, Odetade D, Hardy M, Goldberg Oppenheimer P Discov Nano. 2023; 18(1):153.

PMID: 38082047 PMC: 10713959. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-023-03938-x.


References
1.
Ito , Okazaki . Pushing the limits of lithography. Nature. 2000; 406(6799):1027-31. DOI: 10.1038/35023233. View

2.
Massey G . Microscopy and pattern generation with scanned evanescent waves. Appl Opt. 1984; 23(5):658. DOI: 10.1364/ao.23.000658. View

3.
Xia Y, Rogers J, Paul K, Whitesides G . Unconventional Methods for Fabricating and Patterning Nanostructures. Chem Rev. 2002; 99(7):1823-1848. DOI: 10.1021/cr980002q. View

4.
Huo F, Zheng G, Liao X, Giam L, Chai J, Chen X . Beam pen lithography. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010; 5(9):637-40. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.161. View

5.
Liao X, Brown K, Schmucker A, Liu G, He S, Shim W . Desktop nanofabrication with massively multiplexed beam pen lithography. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2103. PMC: 3807695. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3103. View