» Articles » PMID: 32017784

Ray Propagation Imaging and Optical Quality Evaluation of Different Intraocular Lens Models

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32017784
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6AD1 [Alcon], a diffractive trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 [Alcon], and a diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) Symfony ZXR00 [Johnson&Johnson]. An experimental set-up with a water bath containing 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic green laser light (532 nm) was used to visualize the propagation of light rays. Also, the optical performance of the IOLs was evaluated by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at a pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II (Trioptics GmbH, Germany).

Results: Both the diffractive-refractive bifocal IOL and the EDOF IOL showed two defined foci for distance and near vision. In the diffractive trifocal IOL, three distinct foci for distance, intermediate, and near vision could be visualized.

Conclusions: The ray propagation visualization technique allows a qualitative assessment and comparison of light energy distribution between different IOL models. The measured Through-Focus Response (TFR) quantitatively confirmed the evaluated ray propagation behavior.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Chen Q, Zhang G J Ophthalmol. 2024; 2024:5571802.

PMID: 39444423 PMC: 11496590. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5571802.


Analysis of the optical performance of intraocular lenses using profilometric measurements.

Miret J, Camps V, Garcia C, Caballero M, Gonzalez-Leal J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 263(2):451-465.

PMID: 39287656 PMC: 11868146. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06628-1.


Functional Design Analysis of Two Current Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Mendroch D, Oberheide U, Altmeyer S Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(8):33.

PMID: 39167376 PMC: 11343009. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.33.


Optical Bench Evaluation of the Latest Refractive Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

Schmid R, Borkenstein A Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1921-1932.

PMID: 38978835 PMC: 11229011. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S469849.


Outcomes after bilateral implantation of AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens: a prospective interventional study.

Sahin V, Unal M, Ayaz Y Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023; 12(1):36-45.

PMID: 37641668 PMC: 10445311. DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1468.


References
1.
Labuz G, Yildirim T, van den Berg T, Khoramnia R, Auffarth G . Assessment of straylight and the modulation transfer function of intraocular lenses with centrally localized opacification associated with the intraocular injection of gas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44(5):615-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.033. View

2.
Son H, Tandogan T, Liebing S, Merz P, Choi C, Khoramnia R . In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1):108. PMC: 5492950. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0460-0. View

3.
Labuz G, Auffarth G, Ozen A, van den Berg T, Yildirim T, Son H . The Effect of a Spectral Filter on Visual Quality in Patients with an Extended-Depth-Of-Focus Intraocular Lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 208:56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.001. View

4.
Kohnen T, Derhartunian V . [Apodized diffractive optic. New concept in multifocal lens technology]. Ophthalmologe. 2007; 104(10):899-904, 906-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-007-1637-3. View

5.
Tognetto D, Sanguinetti G, Sirotti P, Cecchini P, Marcucci L, Ballone E . Analysis of the optical quality of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45(8):2682-90. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-1024. View