» Articles » PMID: 16129302

Imaging Quality of Intraocular Lenses

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2005 Sep 1
PMID 16129302
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the imaging quality of several commercially available intraocular lenses (IOLs) using the modulation transfer function (MTF) method according to the requirements of the International Standard European Industrial Norm/International Organization for Standardization 11979.

Setting: Universitat für Technik der Informationsverarbeitung, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe and Universitäts Augenklinik, Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Methods: Two refractive powers (+13 diopter [D] and +26 D) of each IOL type were tested. The imaging quality of all tested IOLs was measured before the injection test and in 5-minute intervals after the injection for 40 minutes. The measurement data were analyzed according to 2 quality criteria, Strehl ratio and the ISO condition. For analysis of the type of optical design, SEM images of the central cross section were taken of each IOL. Basic terms in optics such as MTF, resolution, and optical aberration are introduced, and their relevance for ophthalmology is discussed in detail. This paper represents an extensive study comparing the imaging quality of various IOLs including the comparison of measurements before and after injection through a cartridge as used for state-of-the-art implantation techniques. All measurements were performed using an MTF measurement system using a 546 nm optimized laser source and an effective aperture of 3.0 mm on the IOL according to ISO standard. An ISO standard eye model using an artificial cornea (spherical design) and a watery solution to simulate in vivo conditions was used.

Results: All IOLs apart from 1 +26 D lens complied with ISO standard requirements. However, the imaging quality varied up to 49% depending on the optical design and the manufacturing quality.

Conclusion: When the methods and materials recommended by the manufacturer for IOL injection through a cartridge were used, no long-term effect on the imaging quality of the IOLs was observed. However, the basic imaging quality of different designs and different manufacturers varied significantly (up to 50% at +26 D) IOLs and should be considered when choosing an IOL.

Citing Articles

Imaging Function and Relative Light Transmission of Explanted Opacified Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses.

Naujokaitis T, Khoramnia R, Labuz G, Choi C, Auffarth G, Tandogan T Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37238287 PMC: 10217119. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101804.


Comparison of a Presbyopia-Correcting Supplementary Intraocular Lens Combination and a Capsular-Bag Lens: An In Vitro Study.

Khoramnia R, Baur I, Yan W, Labuz G, Auffarth G Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37189583 PMC: 10137998. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13081482.


Opto-Mechanical Eye Models, a Review on Human Vision Applications and Perspectives for Use in Industry.

Amorim A, Bret B, Gonzalez-Meijome J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19).

PMID: 36236784 PMC: 9573708. DOI: 10.3390/s22197686.


Method for the generation and visualization of cross-sectional images of three-dimensional point spread functions for rotationally symmetric intraocular lenses.

Sievers J, Elsner R, Bohn S, Schunemann M, Stolz H, Guthoff R Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 13(2):1087-1101.

PMID: 35284182 PMC: 8884235. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.446869.


Pupillodynamics and corneal spherical aberrations in a set of Indian cataract patients and its implications for aberrometric customisation of intraocular lenses.

Paryani M, Kharbanda V, Kummelil M, Wadia K, Darak A Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020; 68(12):3012-3015.

PMID: 33229688 PMC: 7856991. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_218_20.