» Articles » PMID: 3195995

Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Ciprofloxacin and Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1988 Sep 1
PMID 3195995
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the effect of ciprofloxacin (250 mg orally, twice daily) was compared with that of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim and 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole orally, twice daily) on 45 patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Pretherapy isolates were all members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates were eradicated from 18 (82%) of 22 patients treated with ciprofloxacin and 12 (52%) of 23 patients treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole during and 5 to 9 days after therapy (P = 0.035). Both groups had similar relapse and reinfection rates at 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy. Adverse effects were mild and reversible, occurring in 1 of 22 in the ciprofloxacin group and 6 of 23 in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group. Disk diffusion susceptibility tests correlated better with broth macrodilution for ciprofloxacin than for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Ciprofloxacin is a safe, effective alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

Citing Articles

The 6R's of drug induced nephrotoxicity.

Awdishu L, Mehta R BMC Nephrol. 2017; 18(1):124.

PMID: 28372552 PMC: 5379580. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0536-3.


Comparative effectiveness of different oral antibiotics regimens for treatment of urinary tract infection in outpatients: an analysis of national representative claims database.

Lee M, Lee S, Chang S, Lee S, Lee M, Fang C Medicine (Baltimore). 2014; 93(28):e304.

PMID: 25526477 PMC: 4603088. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000304.


Systematic review and meta-analysis of antimicrobial treatment effect estimation in complicated urinary tract infection.

Singh K, Li G, Mitrani-Gold F, Kurtinecz M, Wetherington J, Tomayko J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57(11):5284-90.

PMID: 23939900 PMC: 3811298. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01257-13.


Quinolone antibacterial agents for the treatment of genitourinary tract infections.

Babinchak T, Fass R Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989; 8(12):1111-6.

PMID: 2695332 DOI: 10.1007/BF01975178.


Treatment of genitourinary tract infections with fluoroquinolones: clinical efficacy in genital infections and adverse effects.

Hooper D, Wolfson J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989; 33(10):1662-7.

PMID: 2686546 PMC: 172734. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.10.1662.


References
1.
Gleckman R, Crowley M, NATSIOS G . Therapy of recurrent invasive urinary-tract infections of men. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301(16):878-80. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197910183011607. View

2.
VELLUCCI A, Bernardini G, Battaglia A, Battaglia P . Ofloxacin vs. cotrimoxazole in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1987; 25(5):279-81. View

3.
Kaye D . Urinary tract infections in the elderly. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1980; 56(2):209-20. PMC: 1805129. View

4.
Gargan R, Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller J . Antibody-coated bacteria in urine: criterion for a positive test and its value in defining a higher risk of treatment failure. Lancet. 1983; 2(8352):704-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92247-x. View

5.
Sheldon C, Gonzalez R . Differentiation of upper and lower urinary tract infections: how and when?. Med Clin North Am. 1984; 68(2):321-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)31133-6. View