Water-fat Separation in Spiral Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for High Temporal Resolution Tissue Relaxation Time Quantification in Muscle
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: To minimize the known biases introduced by fat in rapid T and T quantification in muscle using a single-run magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) water-fat separation sequence.
Methods: The single-run MRF acquisition uses an alternating in-phase/out-of-phase TE pattern to achieve water-fat separation based on a 2-point DIXON method. Conjugate phase reconstruction and fat deblurring were applied to correct for B inhomogeneities and chemical shift blurring. Water and fat signals were matched to the on-resonance MRF dictionary. The method was first tested in a multicompartment phantom. To test whether the approach is capable of measuring small in vivo dynamic changes in relaxation times, experiments were run in 9 healthy volunteers; parameter values were compared with and without water-fat separation during muscle recovery after plantar flexion exercise.
Results: Phantom results show the robustness of the water-fat resolving MRF approach to undersampling. Parameter maps in volunteers show a significant (P < .01) increase in T (105 ± 94 ms) and decrease in T (14 ± 6 ms) when using water-fat-separated MRF, suggesting improved parameter quantification by reducing the well-known biases introduced by fat. Exercise results showed smooth T and T recovery curves.
Conclusion: Water-fat separation using conjugate phase reconstruction is possible within a single-run MRF scan. This technique can be used to rapidly map relaxation times in studies requiring dynamic scanning, in which the presence of fat is problematic.
Monga A, Singh D, De Moura H, Zhang X, Zibetti M, Regatte R Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(3).
PMID: 38534511 PMC: 10968015. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030236.
OReilly T, Bornert P, Liu H, Webb A, Koolstra K MAGMA. 2023; 36(3):499-512.
PMID: 37202655 PMC: 10386962. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01092-0.
Ramping down a clinical 3 T scanner: a journey into MRI and MRS at 0.75 T.
Guenthner C, Peereboom S, Dillinger H, McGrath C, Albannay M, Vishnevskiy V MAGMA. 2023; 36(3):355-373.
PMID: 37171689 PMC: 10386956. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01089-9.
Ostenson J, Robison R, Brittain E, Damon B Magn Reson Imaging. 2023; 99:58-66.
PMID: 36764629 PMC: 10088071. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.02.001.
Feasibility study of 2D Dixon-Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) of breast cancer.
Zanderigo E, Huck L, Distelmaier M, Dethlefsen E, Maywald M, Truhn D Eur J Radiol Open. 2022; 9:100453.
PMID: 36411785 PMC: 9674879. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100453.