» Articles » PMID: 31897292

Effects of Regional Differences and Demography in Modelling Foot-and-mouth Disease in Cattle at the National Scale

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Jan 4
PMID 31897292
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a fast-spreading viral infection that can produce large and costly outbreaks in livestock populations. Transmission occurs at multiple spatial scales, as can the actions used to control outbreaks. The US cattle industry is spatially expansive, with heterogeneous distributions of animals and infrastructure. We have developed a model that incorporates the effects of scale for both disease transmission and control actions, applied here in simulating FMD outbreaks in US cattle. We simulated infection initiating in each of the 3049 counties in the contiguous US, 100 times per county. When initial infection was located in specific regions, large outbreaks were more likely to occur, driven by infrastructure and other demographic attributes such as premises clustering and number of cattle on premises. Sensitivity analyses suggest these attributes had more impact on outbreak metrics than the ranges of estimated disease parameter values. Additionally, although shipping accounted for a small percentage of overall transmission, areas receiving the most animal shipments tended to have other attributes that increase the probability of large outbreaks. The importance of including spatial and demographic heterogeneity in modelling outbreak trajectories and control actions is illustrated by specific regions consistently producing larger outbreaks than others.

Citing Articles

Laboratory testing and on-site storage are successful at mitigating the risk of release of foot-and-mouth disease virus via production of bull semen in the USA.

Meyer A, Weiker J, Meyer R PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0294036.

PMID: 37934775 PMC: 10629637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294036.


Simulating contact networks for livestock disease epidemiology: a systematic review.

Leung W, Rudge J, Fournie G J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(202):20220890.

PMID: 37194271 PMC: 10189310. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0890.


The Importance of Livestock Demography and Infrastructure in Driving Foot and Mouth Disease Dynamics.

Gilbertson K, Brommesson P, Minter A, Hallman C, Miller R, Portacci K Life (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36295038 PMC: 9605081. DOI: 10.3390/life12101604.


Integration of computational tools, data analysis and social science into food safety risk assessment.

Lorenzoni A, Tsoulli C, McCarthy Apha C, Adkin A EFSA J. 2020; 18(Suppl 1):e181108.

PMID: 33294047 PMC: 7691617. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181108.

References
1.
Charleston B, Bankowski B, Gubbins S, Chase-Topping M, Schley D, Howey R . Relationship between clinical signs and transmission of an infectious disease and the implications for control. Science. 2011; 332(6030):726-9. PMC: 5844461. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199884. View

2.
Lentz H, Koher A, Hovel P, Gethmann J, Sauter-Louis C, Selhorst T . Disease Spread through Animal Movements: A Static and Temporal Network Analysis of Pig Trade in Germany. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155196. PMC: 4859575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155196. View

3.
Jewell C, Keeling M, Roberts G . Predicting undetected infections during the 2007 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak. J R Soc Interface. 2008; 6(41):1145-51. PMC: 2817150. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0433. View

4.
Werkman M, Tildesley M, Brooks-Pollock E, Keeling M . Preserving privacy whilst maintaining robust epidemiological predictions. Epidemics. 2016; 17:35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2016.10.004. View

5.
Sander J, Warbington M, Myers L . Selected methods of animal carcass disposal. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002; 220(7):1003-5. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1003. View