» Articles » PMID: 20205988

Parameterization of the Duration of Infection Stages of Serotype O Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus: an Analytical Review and Meta-analysis with Application to Simulation Models

Overview
Journal Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Mar 9
PMID 20205988
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is considered one of the most important infectious diseases of livestock because of the devastating economic consequences that it inflicts in affected regions. The value of critical parameters, such as the duration of the latency or the duration of the infectious periods, which affect the transmission rate of the FMD virus (FMDV), are believed to be influenced by characteristics of the host and the virus. Disease control and surveillance strategies, as well as FMD simulation models, will benefit from improved parameter estimation. The objective of this study was to quantify the distributions of variables associated with the duration of the latency, subclinical, incubation, and infectiousness periods of FMDV transmission. A double independent, systematic review of 19 retrieved publications reporting results from experimental trials, using 295 animals in four reference laboratories, was performed to extract individual values related to FMDV transmission. Probability density functions were fitted to data and a set of regression models were used to identify factors associated with the assessed parameters. Latent, subclinical, incubation, and infectious periods ranged from 3.1 to 4.8, 2 to 2.3, 5.5 to 6.6, and 3.3 to 5.7 days, respectively. Durations were significantly (p < 0.05) associated independently with route of exposure, type of donor, animal species, strains, characteristics of sampling, and clinical signs. These results will contribute to the improvement of disease control and surveillance strategies and stochastic models used to simulate FMD spread and, ultimately, development of cost-effective plans to prevent and control the potential spread of the disease in FMD-free regions of the world.

Citing Articles

Modeling foot-and-mouth disease dissemination in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and evaluating the effectiveness of control measures.

Cardenas N, Lopes F, Machado A, Maran V, Trois C, Machado F Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1468864.

PMID: 39564186 PMC: 11575146. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1468864.


Impact of infectious diseases on wild bovidae populations in Thailand: insights from population modelling and disease dynamics.

Horpiencharoen W, Marshall J, Muylaert R, John R, Hayman D J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240278.

PMID: 38955228 PMC: 11285862. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0278.


Laboratory testing and on-site storage are successful at mitigating the risk of release of foot-and-mouth disease virus via production of bull semen in the USA.

Meyer A, Weiker J, Meyer R PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0294036.

PMID: 37934775 PMC: 10629637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294036.


Prevalence and Concentration of Mycotoxins in Animal Feed in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jalilzadeh-Amin G, Dalir-Naghadeh B, Ahmadnejad-Asl-Gavgani M, Fallah A, Khaneghah A Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36977105 PMC: 10054064. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15030214.


Main factors associated with foot-and-mouth disease virus infection during the 2001 FMD epidemic in Uruguay.

Iriarte M, Gonzales J, de Freitas Costa E, Gil A, de Jong M Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1070188.

PMID: 36816185 PMC: 9932531. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1070188.


References
1.
Samuel A, Knowles N . Foot-and-mouth disease type O viruses exhibit genetically and geographically distinct evolutionary lineages (topotypes). J Gen Virol. 2001; 82(Pt 3):609-621. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-3-609. View

2.
Sanchez J, Dohoo I, Carrier J, Carrier J, DesCoteaux L . A meta-analysis of the milk-production response after anthelmintic treatment in naturally infected adult dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 2004; 63(3-4):237-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.01.006. View

3.
Bates T, Thurmond M, Carpenter T . Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. Am J Vet Res. 2001; 62(7):1121-9. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1121. View

4.
Samuel A, Knowles N . Foot-and-mouth disease virus: cause of the recent crisis for the UK livestock industry. Trends Genet. 2001; 17(8):421-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02374-5. View

5.
Keeling M, Woolhouse M, Shaw D, Matthews L, Chase-Topping M, Haydon D . Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science. 2001; 294(5543):813-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1065973. View