» Articles » PMID: 31858078

A Machine Learning Model to Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 21
PMID 31858078
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Some patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are more likely to experience disease progression despite transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment, and thus would benefit from early switching to other therapeutic regimens. We sought to evaluate a fully automated machine learning algorithm that uses pre-therapeutic quantitative computed tomography (CT) image features and clinical factors to predict HCC response to TACE.

Materials And Methods: Outcome information from 105 patients receiving first-line treatment with TACE was evaluated retrospectively. The primary clinical endpoint was time to progression (TTP) based on follow-up CT radiological criteria (mRECIST). A 14-week cutoff was used to classify patients as TACE-susceptible (TTP ≥14 weeks) or TACE-refractory (TTP <14 weeks). Response to TACE was predicted using a random forest classifier with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and quantitative image features as input as well as the BCLC stage alone as a control.

Results: The model's response prediction accuracy rate was 74.2% (95% CI=64%-82%) using a combination of the BCLC stage plus quantitative image features versus 62.9% (95% CI= 52%-72%) using the BCLC stage alone. Shape image features of the tumor and background liver were the dominant features correlated to the TTP as selected by the Boruta method and were used to predict the outcome.

Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that quantitative image features obtained prior to therapy can improve the accuracy of predicting response of HCC to TACE. This approach is likely to provide useful information for aiding HCC patient selection for TACE.

Citing Articles

All You Need to Know About TACE: A Comprehensive Review of Indications, Techniques, Efficacy, Limits, and Technical Advancement.

Lanza C, Ascenti V, Amato G, Pellegrino G, Triggiani S, Tintori J J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860320 PMC: 11766109. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020314.


Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care.

Nishida N Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768061 PMC: 11673237. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121243.


Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Predicting Transarterial Chemoembolization Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Cho E, Law M, Yu Z, Yong J, Tan C, Tan E Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(2):533-542.

PMID: 39708260 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08747-5.


Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Abdominal Imaging.

Loper M, Makary M Tomography. 2024; 10(11):1814-1831.

PMID: 39590942 PMC: 11598375. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10110133.


Interventional Oncology Meets Immuno-oncology: Combination Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Bitar R, Salem R, Finn R, Greten T, Goldberg S, Chapiro J Radiology. 2024; 313(2):e232875.

PMID: 39560477 PMC: 11605110. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232875.


References
1.
Huang G, Yang L, Lu W . Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact on neovascularization and survival. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11(11):1705-8. PMC: 4305959. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i11.1705. View

2.
Li P, Cao Y, Li Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Geng M . Expression of Wnt-5a and β-catenin in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014; 7(6):3190-5. PMC: 4097247. View

3.
Facciorusso A, Serviddio G, Muscatiello N . Local ablative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 7(4):477-489. PMC: 5095567. DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i4.477. View

4.
Sohn J, Duran R, Zhao Y, Fleckenstein F, Chapiro J, Sahu S . Validation of the Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System in Determining Prognosis of the North American Patients Following Intra-arterial Therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 15(5):746-755.e4. PMC: 5823259. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.036. View

5.
Huang K, Zhou Q, Wang R, Cheng D, Ma Y . Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 29(5):920-5. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12439. View