» Articles » PMID: 31841421

Tactile Exploration Strategies With Natural Compliant Objects Elicit Virtual Stiffness Cues

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 17
PMID 31841421
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When interacting with deformable objects, tactile cues at the finger pad help inform our perception of material compliance. Nearly all prior studies have relied on highly homogenous, engineered materials such as silicone-elastomers and foams. In contrast, we employ soft plum fruit varying in ripeness; ecological substances associated with tasks of everyday life. In this article, we investigate volitional exploratory strategies and contact interactions, for comparison to engineered materials. New measurement techniques are introduced, including an ink-based method to capture finger pad to fruit contact interactions, and instrumented force and optical sensors to capture imposed force and displacement. Human-subjects experiments are conducted for both single finger touch and two finger grasp. The results indicate that terminal contact areas between soft and hard plums are indistinguishable, but the newly defined metric of virtual stiffness can differentiate between the fruits' ripeness, amidst their local variations in geometry, stiffness, and viscoelasticity. Moreover, it affords discrimination independent of one's touch force. This metric illustrates the tie between the deployment of active, exploratory strategies and the elicitation of optimal cues for perceptual discrimination. Compared to single finger touch, perceptual discrimination improves further in pinch grasp, which is indeed a more natural gesture for judging ripeness.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Task Context on Pleasantness and Softness Estimations: A Study Based on Three Touch Strategies.

Gao B, Yu Y, Ejima Y, Wu J, Yang J Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851867 PMC: 11761304. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010063.


Faster Indentation Influences Skin Deformation To Reduce Tactile Discriminability of Compliant Objects.

Li B, Hauser S, Gerling G IEEE Trans Haptics. 2023; 16(2):215-227.

PMID: 37028048 PMC: 10357367. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2023.3253256.


Potential Haptic Perceptual Dimensionality of Rendered Compliance.

Shao Z, Li J, Feng W, Tang H Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 36810395 PMC: 9944077. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8010064.


3D Visual Tracking to Quantify Physical Contact Interactions in Human-to-Human Touch.

Xu S, Xu C, McIntyre S, Olausson H, Gerling G Front Physiol. 2022; 13:841938.

PMID: 35755449 PMC: 9219726. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.841938.


Individual Performance in Compliance Discrimination is Constrained by Skin Mechanics but Improved under Active Control.

Xu C, Wang Y, Gerling G World Haptics Conf. 2022; 2021:445-450.

PMID: 35043107 PMC: 8763326. DOI: 10.1109/whc49131.2021.9517269.


References
1.
Bergmann Tiest W, Kappers A . Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2009; 2(4):189-199. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2009.16. View

2.
Hauser S, Gerling G . Measuring tactile cues at the fingerpad for object compliances harder and softer than the skin. IEEE Haptics Symp. 2016; 2016:247-252. PMC: 4908960. DOI: 10.1109/HAPTICS.2016.7463185. View

3.
Weber A, Saal H, Lieber J, Cheng J, Manfredi L, Dammann 3rd J . Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(42):17107-12. PMC: 3800989. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305509110. View

4.
Wu B, Klatzky R . A recursive Bayesian updating model of haptic stiffness perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018; 44(6):941-952. PMC: 5975086. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000501. View

5.
Caldiran O, Tan H, Basdogan C . Visuo-Haptic Discrimination of Viscoelastic Materials. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019; 12(4):438-450. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2924212. View