» Articles » PMID: 25699293

Computational Modeling Reinforces That Proprioceptive Cues May Augment Compliance Discrimination When Elasticity Is Decoupled From Radius of Curvature

Overview
Journal Haptics (2014)
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Feb 21
PMID 25699293
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our capability to discriminate object compliance is based on cues both tactile and proprioceptive, in addition to visual. To understand how the mechanics of the fingertip skin and bone might encode such information, we used finite element models to simulate the task of differentiating spherical indenters of radii (4, 6 and 8 mm) and elasticity (initial shear modulus of 10, 50 and 90 kPa). In particular, we considered two response variables, the strain energy density (SED) at the epidermal-dermal interface where Merkel cell end-organs of slowly adapting type I afferents reside, and the displacement of the fingertip bone necessary to achieve certain surface contact force. The former variable ties to tactile cues while the latter ties to proprioceptive cues. The results indicate that distributions of SED are clearly distinct for most combinations of object radii and elasticity. However, for certain combinations - e.g., between 4 mm spheres of 10 kPa and 8 mm of 90 kPa - spatial distributions of SED are nearly identical. In such cases where tactile-only cues are non-differentiable, we may rely on proprioceptive cues to discriminate compliance.

Citing Articles

Roles of Force Cues and Proprioceptive Joint Angles in Active Exploration of Compliant Objects.

Xu C, Hauser S, Wang Y, Gerling G World Haptics Conf. 2021; 2019.

PMID: 34765101 PMC: 8580133. DOI: 10.1109/whc.2019.8816159.


Organic Haptics: Intersection of Materials Chemistry and Tactile Perception.

Lipomi D, Dhong C, Carpenter C, Root N, Ramachandran V Adv Funct Mater. 2021; 30(29).

PMID: 34276273 PMC: 8281818. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201906850.


An elasticity-curvature illusion decouples cutaneous and proprioceptive cues in active exploration of soft objects.

Xu C, Wang Y, Gerling G PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(3):e1008848.

PMID: 33750948 PMC: 8016306. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008848.


Tactile Exploration Strategies With Natural Compliant Objects Elicit Virtual Stiffness Cues.

Xu C, He H, Hauser S, Gerling G IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019; 13(1):4-10.

PMID: 31841421 PMC: 7147988. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2959767.


In the Tactile Discrimination of Compliance, Perceptual Cues in Addition to Contact Area Are Required.

Xu C, Wang Y, Hauser S, Gerling G Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2019; 62(1):1535-1539.

PMID: 31787831 PMC: 6884142. DOI: 10.1177/1541931218621347.


References
1.
Friedman R, Hester K, Green B, LaMotte R . Magnitude estimation of softness. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 191(2):133-42. PMC: 2574806. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1507-5. View

2.
Bergmann Tiest W, Kappers A . Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2009; 2(4):189-199. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2009.16. View

3.
Gerling G, Rivest I, Lesniak D, Scanlon J, Wan L . Validating a population model of tactile mechanotransduction of slowly adapting type I afferents at levels of skin mechanics, single-unit response and psychophysics. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014; 7(2):216-28. PMC: 4300237. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2013.36. View

4.
Condon M, Birznieks I, Hudson K, Chelvanayagam D, Mahns D, Olausson H . Differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 111(6):1308-17. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00589.2013. View

5.
Srinivasan M, LaMotte R . Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73(1):88-101. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.88. View