» Articles » PMID: 31787831

In the Tactile Discrimination of Compliance, Perceptual Cues in Addition to Contact Area Are Required

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 3
PMID 31787831
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In our ability to discriminate compliant, or 'soft,' objects, we rely upon information acquired from interactions at the finger pad. We have yet to resolve the most pertinent perceptual cues. However, doing so is vital for building effective, dynamic displays. By introducing psychophysical illusions through spheres of various size and elasticity, we investigate the utility of contact area cues, thought to be key in encoding compliance. For both active and passive touch, we determine finger pad-to-stimulus contact areas, using an ink-based procedure, as well as discrimination thresholds. The findings indicate that in passive touch, participants cannot discriminate certain small compliant versus large stiff spheres, which generate similar contact areas. In active touch, however, participants easily discriminate these spheres, though contact areas remain similar. Supplementary cues based on stimulus rate and/or proprioception seem vital. One cue that does differ for illusion cases is finger displacement given a volitionally applied force.

Citing Articles

Assessing the representational structure of softness activated by words.

Cavdan M, Goktepe N, Drewing K, Doerschner K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8974.

PMID: 37268674 PMC: 10238515. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35169-6.


Roles of Force Cues and Proprioceptive Joint Angles in Active Exploration of Compliant Objects.

Xu C, Hauser S, Wang Y, Gerling G World Haptics Conf. 2021; 2019.

PMID: 34765101 PMC: 8580133. DOI: 10.1109/whc.2019.8816159.


Identifying 3-D spatiotemporal skin deformation cues evoked in interacting with compliant elastic surfaces.

Li B, Hauser S, Gerling G IEEE Haptics Symp. 2021; 2020:35-40.

PMID: 34458383 PMC: 8395532. DOI: 10.1109/haptics45997.2020.ras.hap20.22.5a9b38d8.


Time-dependent Cues Encode the Minimum Exploration Time in Discriminating Naturalistic Compliances.

Xu C, Gerling G IEEE Haptics Symp. 2021; 2020:22-27.

PMID: 34447856 PMC: 8386199. DOI: 10.1109/haptics45997.2020.ras.hap20.7.ec43f6a7.


Organic Haptics: Intersection of Materials Chemistry and Tactile Perception.

Lipomi D, Dhong C, Carpenter C, Root N, Ramachandran V Adv Funct Mater. 2021; 30(29).

PMID: 34276273 PMC: 8281818. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201906850.


References
1.
Bergmann Tiest W, Kappers A . Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2009; 2(4):189-199. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2009.16. View

2.
Hauser S, Gerling G . Measuring tactile cues at the fingerpad for object compliances harder and softer than the skin. IEEE Haptics Symp. 2016; 2016:247-252. PMC: 4908960. DOI: 10.1109/HAPTICS.2016.7463185. View

3.
Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Igo Krebs H, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera W . Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(18):8297-304. PMC: 6758113. View

4.
Carson W, Gerling G, Krupski T, Kowalik C, Harper J, Moskaluk C . Material characterization of ex vivo prostate tissue via spherical indentation in the clinic. Med Eng Phys. 2010; 33(3):302-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.013. View

5.
Gerling G, Hauser S, Soltis B, Bowen A, Fanta K, Wang Y . A Standard Methodology to Characterize the Intrinsic Material Properties of Compliant Test Stimuli. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2018; 11(4):498-508. PMC: 6396288. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2018.2825396. View