» Articles » PMID: 31831547

Current Tools Available for Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy: a Scoping Review Protocol

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Dec 14
PMID 31831547
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy, defined as the delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services is responsible in part for suboptimal levels of vaccination coverage worldwide. The WHO recommends that countries incorporate plans to measure and address vaccine hesitancy into their immunisation programmes. This requires that governments and health institutions be able to detect concerns about vaccination in the population and monitor changes in vaccination behaviours. To do this effectively, tools to detect and measure vaccine hesitancy are required. The purpose of this scoping review is to give a broad overview of currently available vaccine hesitancy measuring tools and present a summary of their nature, similarities and differences.

Methods And Analysis: The review will be conducted using the framework for scoping review proffered by Arksey and O'Malley. It will comply with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews' guidelines. The broader research question of this review is: what vaccine hesitancy measuring tools are currently available?Search strategies will be developed using controlled vocabulary and selected keywords. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and reference lists of relevant publications will be searched. Titles and abstracts will be independently screened by two authors and data from full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria will be extracted independently by two authors using a pretested data charting form. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Results will be presented using descriptive statistics such as percentages, tables, charts and flow diagrams as appropriate. Narrative analysis will be used to summarise the findings of the review.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for the review. It will be submitted as part of a doctoral thesis, presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial Registration Number: https://osf.io/x8fjk/.

Citing Articles

Developing a practical tool for measuring parental vaccine hesitancy: A people-centered validation approach in Dutch.

Bussink-Voorend D, Hautvast J, Wiersma T, Akkermans R, Hulscher M Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025; 21(1):2466303.

PMID: 39957364 PMC: 11834527. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2466303.


Association of vaccine intention against COVID-19 using the 5C Scale and its constructs: a Pima County, Arizona cross-sectional survey.

Block Ngaybe M, Mantina N, Pope B, Raghuraman V, Marczak J, Velickovic S PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18316.

PMID: 39655324 PMC: 11627084. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18316.


A Comprehensive Model for Understanding Breast Cancer Screening Hesitancy: Integrating the Health Belief Model and the Confidence, Convenience, Complacency, Constraints, and Risk and Responsibility Calculations (5C) Model.

Liao Y, Mohd Hairon S, Yaacob N, Luo L, Ismail T Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71583.

PMID: 39553070 PMC: 11565091. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71583.


Vaccine Confidence and Coverage among Medical Students at a Federal University in Brazil.

Feijo R, Bertotto J, Pinto A, Leal M, de Souza V, Sakai V Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39340025 PMC: 11435744. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12090993.


Allocation of Financial Resources to Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Mahdiyan S, Rezayatmand R, Amini-Rarani M, Shaarbafchizadeh N Int J Prev Med. 2024; 15:32.

PMID: 39239297 PMC: 11376499. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_264_23.


References
1.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

2.
Bloom B, Marcuse E, Mnookin S . Addressing vaccine hesitancy. Science. 2014; 344(6182):339. DOI: 10.1126/science.1254834. View

3.
Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, Korn L, Holtmann C, Bohm R . Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0208601. PMC: 6285469. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208601. View

4.
Ozawa S, Wonodi C, Babalola O, Ismail T, Bridges J . Using best-worst scaling to rank factors affecting vaccination demand in northern Nigeria. Vaccine. 2017; 35(47):6429-6437. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.079. View

5.
MacDonald N . Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015; 33(34):4161-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. View