» Articles » PMID: 31807319

Germany's Decision to Phase out Coal by 2038 Lags Behind Citizens' Timing Preferences

Overview
Journal Nat Energy
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2019 Dec 7
PMID 31807319
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coal-fired power generation is the single most important source of carbon dioxide emissions in many countries, including Germany. A government commission recently proposed to phase out coal by 2038, which implies that the country will miss its 2020 climate target. Based on a representative sample of German voters assessing 31,744 hypothetical policy scenarios in a choice experiment, we show that voters prefer an earlier phase-out by 2025. They would uphold their support for greater climate ambition up to an additional cost to society of €8.50 billion. Voters in Rhineland and Lusatia, the country's main coal regions, support an earlier phase-out, too, although to a lesser extent. By demonstrating that political decision-makers are more reluctant to overcoming energy path dependence than voters, our analysis calls for further research explaining the influence of particular stakeholders in slowing energy transitions.

Citing Articles

Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition.

Svobodova K, Owen J, Kemp D, Moudry V, Lebre E, Stringer M Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):7674.

PMID: 36522340 PMC: 9755273. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35391-2.


The Effects of Social Protection and Social Cohesion on the Acceptability of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: What Do We (Not) Know in the Context of Low- and Middle-Income Countries?.

Malerba D Eur J Dev Res. 2022; 34(3):1358-1382.

PMID: 35542964 PMC: 9073825. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-022-00537-x.


Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom's and Germany's diverging transitions.

Brauers H, Oei P, Walk P Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2020; 37:238-253.

PMID: 33020728 PMC: 7527286. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001.


Germany's decision to phase out coal by 2038 lags behind citizens' timing preferences.

Rinscheid A, Wustenhagen R Nat Energy. 2019; 4(10):856-863.

PMID: 31807319 PMC: 6894934. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0460-9.

References
1.
Meckling J, Kelsey N, Biber E, Zysman J . CLIMATE CHANGE. Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science. 2015; 349(6253):1170-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab1336. View

2.
Rockstrom J, Gaffney O, Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Schellnhuber H . A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science. 2017; 355(6331):1269-1271. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah3443. View

3.
Geels F, Sovacool B, Schwanen T, Sorrell S . Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science. 2017; 357(6357):1242-1244. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao3760. View

4.
Rinscheid A, Wustenhagen R . Germany's decision to phase out coal by 2038 lags behind citizens' timing preferences. Nat Energy. 2019; 4(10):856-863. PMC: 6894934. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0460-9. View

5.
Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac G . NASA faked the moon landing--therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(5):622-33. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457686. View