» Articles » PMID: 35542964

The Effects of Social Protection and Social Cohesion on the Acceptability of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: What Do We (Not) Know in the Context of Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

Overview
Journal Eur J Dev Res
Date 2022 May 11
PMID 35542964
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant climate change mitigation policies are urgently needed to achieve emissions reduction targets. This paper shows that social protection and social cohesion play a critical role in making climate policies more acceptable to citizens by summarizing existing streams of research focusing on industrialized countries. Further, the empirical analysis explores whether these relationships also hold for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which are increasingly implementing climate change mitigation policies. The results show that vertical and horizontal trust increase acceptability in all countries. However, preferences for social protection have a positive effect only in industrialized ones. This may suggest a contrast between social and environmental goals in LMICs, where social goals are prioritized. The analysis also revealed a significant interaction between social cohesion and social protection. The paper concludes by discussing the existing research gap as to LMICs and outlines policy options to overcome the conflict between social and environmental goals.

Citing Articles

Disentangling the Relationship Between Social Protection and Social Cohesion: Introduction to the Special Issue.

Burchi F, Loewe M, Malerba D, Leininger J Eur J Dev Res. 2022; 34(3):1195-1215.

PMID: 35527722 PMC: 9059109. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-022-00532-2.

References
1.
Beiser-McGrath L, Bernauer T . Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(9):eaax3323. PMC: 6750909. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax3323. View

2.
Cherng S, Cangemi I, Trostle J, Remais J, Eisenberg J . Social cohesion and passive adaptation in relation to climate change and disease. Glob Environ Change. 2020; 58. PMC: 7448570. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101960. View

3.
McCulloch N, Moerenhout T, Yang J . Fuel subsidy reform and the social contract in Nigeria: A micro-economic analysis. Energy Policy. 2021; 156:None. PMC: 8359919. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112336. View

4.
Burchi F, Loewe M, Malerba D, Leininger J . Disentangling the Relationship Between Social Protection and Social Cohesion: Introduction to the Special Issue. Eur J Dev Res. 2022; 34(3):1195-1215. PMC: 9059109. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-022-00532-2. View

5.
Valente T . Putting the network in network interventions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(36):9500-9501. PMC: 5594703. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712473114. View