Transspinal Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Selectively Affects the Excitability of the Corticospinal System, Depending on the Intensity but Not Motor Skills

Overview

Journal Life (Basel)

Specialty Biology

Date 2023 Dec 23

PMID 38137954

Authors

Alena Popyvanova

Ekaterina Pomelova

Dmitry Bredikhin

Maria Koriakina

Anna Shestakova

Evgeny Blagovechtchenski

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate spinal cord activity. However, the effects and mechanisms of this stimulation are currently not comprehensively known. This study aimed to estimate the effect of different intensities of tsDCS applied at the level of cervical enlargement of the spinal cord (C7-Th1 segments) on the excitability of the corticospinal system (CSS) and the correction of motor skills in healthy subjects. The effect of tsDCS was estimated by the motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the primary motor cortex (M1). The study involved 54 healthy adults aged 22 ± 4 years. The application of 11 min anodal tsDCS at the level of the cervical spine C7-Th1 with a current intensity of 2.5 mA did not change the MEP amplitude of the upper limb muscles, in contrast to the data that we previously obtained with a current intensity of 1.5 mA. We also found no difference in the effect of 2.5 mA stimulation on motor skill correction in healthy subjects in the nine-hole peg test (9-HPT) and the serial reaction time task (SRT) as with 1.5 mA stimulation. Our data show that an increase in the intensity of stimulation does not lead to an increase in the effects but rather reduces the effects of stimulation. These results provide information about the optimally appropriate stimulation current intensities to induce CSS excitability and the ability of tsDCS to influence motor skills in healthy adults.

References

Jankowska E . Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2017; 118(2):1221-1234. PMC: 5547263. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00169.2017. View

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo H, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W . Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2016; 595(4):1273-1288. PMC: 5309387. DOI: 10.1113/JP272738. View

Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Pulecchi F, Marceglia S, Priori A . Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(11):2636-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.249. View

Lim C, Shin H . Noninvasive DC stimulation on neck changes MEP. Neuroreport. 2011; 22(16):819-23. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834b939d. View

Schabrun S, Chipchase L, Zipf N, Thickbroom G, Hodges P . Interaction between simultaneously applied neuromodulatory interventions in humans. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(4):624-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.009. View

Pereira M, Fernandes S, Miranda P, de Carvalho M . Neuromodulation of lower limb motor responses with transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018; 129(9):1999-2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.07.002. View

Martin J . The corticospinal system: from development to motor control. Neuroscientist. 2005; 11(2):161-73. DOI: 10.1177/1073858404270843. View

Kuck A, Stegeman D, Van Asseldonk E . Modeling Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in the Presence of Spinal Implants. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019; 27(5):790-797. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2900377. View

Nitsche M, Paulus W . Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001; 57(10):1899-901. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899. View

10.

Jack A, Hurd C, Martin J, Fouad K . Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord. J Neurotrauma. 2020; 37(18):1933-1953. PMC: 7470222. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7033. View

11.

Elbasiouny S, Mushahwar V . Suppressing the excitability of spinal motoneurons by extracellularly applied electrical fields: insights from computer simulations. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007; 103(5):1824-36. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00362.2007. View

12.

Awosika O, Sandrini M, Volochayev R, Thompson R, Fishman N, Wu T . Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans. Brain Stimul. 2019; 12(3):628-634. PMC: 7326485. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.01.017. View

13.

Fernandes S, Salvador R, Wenger C, de Carvalho M, Miranda P . Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation of the lumbar and sacral spinal cord: a modelling study. J Neural Eng. 2018; 15(3):036008. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaac38. View

14.

Monte-Silva K, Kuo M, Hessenthaler S, Fresnoza S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W . Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):424-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011. View

15.

Agboada D, Mosayebi Samani M, Jamil A, Kuo M, Nitsche M . Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18185. PMC: 6890804. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54621-0. View

16.

Hassanzahraee M, Nitsche M, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S . Determination of anodal tDCS intensity threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: an investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16108. PMC: 7527486. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72909-4. View

17.

Fernandes S, Pereira M, Salvador R, Miranda P, de Carvalho M . Cervical trans-spinal direct current stimulation: a modelling-experimental approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1):123. PMC: 6815068. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0589-6. View

18.

Lerner O, Friedman J, Frenkel-Toledo S . The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021; 18(1):103. PMC: 8236155. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00899-z. View

19.

Nuzum N, Hendy A, Russell A, Teo W . Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:487. PMC: 5052268. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487. View

20.

Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Schiaffi E, Marceglia S, Ardolino G, Barbieri S . Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings. Pain. 2010; 152(2):370-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.041. View