» Articles » PMID: 37145136

Effects of Active and Sham TDCS on the Soleus H-reflex During Standing

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 May 5
PMID 37145136
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is known to affect corticospinal excitability and enhance motor skill acquisition, whereas its effects on spinal reflexes in actively contracting muscles are yet to be established. Thus, in this study, we examined the acute effects of Active and Sham tDCS on the soleus H-reflex during standing. In fourteen adults without known neurological conditions, the soleus H-reflex was repeatedly elicited at just above M-wave threshold throughout 30 min of Active (N = 7) or Sham (N = 7) 2-mA tDCS over the primary motor cortex in standing. The maximum H-reflex (H) and M-wave (M) were also measured before and immediately after 30 min of tDCS. The soleus H-reflex amplitudes became significantly larger (by 6%) ≈1 min into Active or Sham tDCS and gradually returned toward the pre-tDCS values, on average, within 15 min. With Active tDCS, the amplitude reduction from the initial increase appeared to occur more swiftly than with Sham tDCS. An acute temporary increase in the soleus H-reflex amplitude within the first minute of Active and Sham tDCS found in this study indicates a previously unreported effect of tDCS on the H-reflex excitability. The present study suggests that neurophysiological characterization of Sham tDCS effects is just as important as investigating Active tDCS effects in understanding and defining acute effects of tDCS on the excitability of spinal reflex pathways.

References
1.
Hordacre B, Moezzi B, Ridding M . Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(8):3326-3339. PMC: 6866552. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24079. View

2.
Agboada D, Mosayebi Samani M, Jamil A, Kuo M, Nitsche M . Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18185. PMC: 6890804. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54621-0. View

3.
Devanathan D, Madhavan S . Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 234(2):377-85. PMC: 5015891. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4470-y. View

4.
Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni A, Chen R . Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128(9):1774-1809. PMC: 5985830. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. View

5.
Xiao S, Wang B, Zhang X, Zhou J, Fu W . Systematic Review of the Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Neuromechanical Management of Foot and Ankle Physical Performance in Healthy Adults. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:587680. PMC: 7673373. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.587680. View