» Articles » PMID: 31775578

Pupillometry As an Objective Measure of Sustained Attention in Young and Older Listeners

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2019 Nov 29
PMID 31775578
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to sustain attention on a task-relevant sound source while avoiding distraction from concurrent sounds is fundamental to listening in crowded environments. We aimed to (a) devise an experimental paradigm with which this aspect of listening can be isolated and (b) evaluate the applicability of pupillometry as an objective measure of sustained attention in young and older populations. We designed a paradigm that continuously measured behavioral responses and pupillometry during 25-s trials. Stimuli contained a number of concurrent, spectrally distinct tone streams. On each trial, participants detected gaps in one of the streams while resisting distraction from the others. Behavior demonstrated increasing difficulty with time-on-task and with number/proximity of distractor streams. In young listeners (N = 20; aged 18 to 35 years), pupil diameter (on the group and individual level) was dynamically modulated by instantaneous task difficulty: Periods where behavioral performance revealed a strain on sustained attention were accompanied by increased pupil diameter. Only trials on which participants performed successfully were included in the pupillometry analysis so that the observed effects reflect task demands as opposed to failure to attend. In line with existing reports, we observed global changes to pupil dynamics in the older group (N = 19; aged 63 to 79 years) including decreased pupil diameter, limited dilation range, and reduced temporal variability. However, despite these changes, older listeners showed similar effects of attentive tracking to those observed in the young listeners. Overall, our results demonstrate that pupillometry can be a reliable and time-sensitive measure of attentive tracking over long durations in both young and (with caveats) older listeners.

Citing Articles

Evidence of physiological changes associated with single-session pre-frontal tDCS: a pilot study.

Rembrandt H, Riley E Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1549248.

PMID: 40070489 PMC: 11893991. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1549248.


Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Johns M, Calloway R, Karunathilake I, Decruy L, Anderson S, Simon J Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241245240.

PMID: 38613337 PMC: 11015766. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241245240.


Pupil Size Sensitivity to Listening Demand Depends on Motivational State.

Kraus F, Obleser J, Herrmann B eNeuro. 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 37989588 PMC: 10734370. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0288-23.2023.


Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.

OLeary R, Neukam J, Hansen T, Kinney A, Capach N, Svirsky M Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231203514.

PMID: 37941344 PMC: 10637151. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231203514.


Use of the first-acquired language modulates pupil size in the processing of island constraint violations.

Martohardjono G, Johns M, Franciotti P, Castillo D, Porru I, Lowry C Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1180989.

PMID: 37519378 PMC: 10382202. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1180989.


References
1.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

2.
Carli M, Robbins T, Evenden J, Everitt B . Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res. 1983; 9(3):361-80. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90138-9. View

3.
Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable J, Myers J . An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci. 2013; 36(6):661-79. PMC: 3856320. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196. View

4.
Moore D, Rosen S, Bamiou D, Campbell N, Sirimanna T . Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): a British Society of Audiology APD special interest group 'white paper'. Int J Audiol. 2012; 52(1):3-13. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.723143. View

5.
Van Gerven P, Paas F, van Merrienboer J, Schmidt H . Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology. 2004; 41(2):167-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00148.x. View