» Articles » PMID: 28253080

Distinct Frontoparietal Networks Underlying Attentional Effort and Cognitive Control

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Mar 3
PMID 28253080
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the brain activity patterns associated with stabilizing performance during challenges to attention. Our findings revealed distinct patterns of frontoparietal activity and functional connectivity associated with increased attentional effort versus preserved performance during challenged attention. Participants performed a visual signal detection task with and without presentation of a perceptual-attention challenge (changing background). The challenge condition increased activation in frontoparietal regions including right mid-dorsal/dorsolateral PFC (RPFC), approximating Brodmann's area 9, and superior parietal cortex. We found that greater behavioral impact of the challenge condition was correlated with greater RPFC activation, suggesting that increased engagement of cognitive control regions is not always sufficient to maintain high levels of performance. Functional connectivity between RPFC and ACC increased during the challenge condition and was also associated with performance declines, suggesting that the level of synchronized engagement of these regions reflects individual differences in attentional effort. Pretask, resting-state RPFC-ACC connectivity did not predict subsequent performance, suggesting that RPFC-ACC connectivity increased dynamically during task performance in response to performance decrement and error feedback. In contrast, functional connectivity between RPFC and superior parietal cortex not only during the task but also during pretask rest was associated with preserved performance in the challenge condition. Together, these data suggest that resting frontoparietal connectivity predicts performance on attention tasks that rely on those same cognitive control networks and that, under challenging conditions, other control regions dynamically couple with this network to initiate the engagement of cognitive control.

Citing Articles

Distinct cholinergic circuits underlie discrete effects of reward on attention.

Runyon K, Bui T, Mazanek S, Hartle A, Marschalko K, Howe W Front Mol Neurosci. 2024; 17:1429316.

PMID: 39268248 PMC: 11390659. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1429316.


Sensitivity to and Control of Distraction: Distractor-Entrained Oscillation and Frontoparietal EEG Gamma Synchronization.

Brown T, Kim K, Gehring W, Lustig C, Bohnen N Brain Sci. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38928609 PMC: 11202030. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060609.


Neural correlates of mindful disengagement from worry.

Westbrook C, Dutcher J, Kusmierski S, Creswell J, Akpan E, Hallion L J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023; 132(1):38-50.

PMID: 36689369 PMC: 11706598. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000804.


Basal Forebrain Chemogenetic Inhibition Converts the Attentional Control Mode of Goal-Trackers to That of Sign-Trackers.

Kucinski A, Avila C, Sarter M eNeuro. 2023; 9(6).

PMID: 36635246 PMC: 9794377. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0418-22.2022.


A role for the claustrum in cognitive control.

Madden M, Stewart B, White M, Krimmel S, Qadir H, Barrett F Trends Cogn Sci. 2022; 26(12):1133-1152.

PMID: 36192309 PMC: 9669149. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.006.


References
1.
Schrouff J, Rosa M, Rondina J, Marquand A, Chu C, Ashburner J . PRoNTo: pattern recognition for neuroimaging toolbox. Neuroinformatics. 2013; 11(3):319-37. PMC: 3722452. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9178-1. View

2.
Turner G, Nathan Spreng R . Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity. Neurobiol Aging. 2011; 33(4):826.e1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.005. View

3.
Demeter E, Hernandez-Garcia L, Sarter M, Lustig C . Challenges to attention: a continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) study of the effects of distraction on sustained attention. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(2):1518-29. PMC: 2997179. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.026. View

4.
Yarkoni T, Poldrack R, Nichols T, Van Essen D, Wager T . Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods. 2011; 8(8):665-70. PMC: 3146590. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1635. View

5.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8. View