» Articles » PMID: 38613337

Attention Mobilization As a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2024 Apr 13
PMID 38613337
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Listening to speech in noise can require substantial mental effort, even among younger normal-hearing adults. The task-evoked pupil response (TEPR) has been shown to track the increased effort exerted to recognize words or sentences in increasing noise. However, few studies have examined the trajectory of listening effort across longer, more natural, stretches of speech, or the extent to which expectations about upcoming listening difficulty modulate the TEPR. Seventeen younger normal-hearing adults listened to 60-s-long audiobook passages, repeated three times in a row, at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) while pupil size was recorded. There was a significant interaction between SNR, repetition, and baseline pupil size on sustained listening effort. At lower baseline pupil sizes, potentially reflecting lower attention mobilization, TEPRs were more sustained in the harder SNR condition, particularly when attention mobilization remained low by the third presentation. At intermediate baseline pupil sizes, differences between conditions were largely absent, suggesting these listeners had optimally mobilized their attention for both SNRs. Lastly, at higher baseline pupil sizes, potentially reflecting overmobilization of attention, the effect of SNR was initially reversed for the second and third presentations: participants initially appeared to disengage in the harder SNR condition, resulting in reduced TEPRs that recovered in the second half of the story. Together, these findings suggest that the unfolding of listening effort over time depends critically on the extent to which individuals have successfully mobilized their attention in anticipation of difficult listening conditions.

Citing Articles

Three Hundred Hertz Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) Impacts Pupil Size Non-Linearly as a Function of Intensity.

Phillips I, Johns M, Pandza N, Calloway R, Karuzis V, Kuchinsky S Psychophysiology. 2025; 62(2):e70011.

PMID: 40013407 PMC: 11866280. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.70011.


Repairing Misperceptions of Words Early in a Sentence is More Effortful Than Repairing Later Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Smith M, Winn M Trends Hear. 2025; 29:23312165251320789.

PMID: 39995109 PMC: 11851752. DOI: 10.1177/23312165251320789.


Predictive brain activity related to auditory information is associated with performance in speech comprehension tasks in noisy environments.

Okamoto K, Hoyano K, Saiki Y, Nomura T, Irie K, Obama N Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1479810.

PMID: 39539352 PMC: 11557536. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1479810.

References
1.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

2.
Winn M, Moore A . Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518808962. PMC: 6207967. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518808962. View

3.
Winn M . Rapid Release From Listening Effort Resulting From Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2016; 20. PMC: 5051669. DOI: 10.1177/2331216516669723. View

4.
Fortenbaugh F, DeGutis J, Esterman M . Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017; 1396(1):70-91. PMC: 5522184. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13318. View

5.
Winn M, Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Kuchinsky S . Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518800869. PMC: 6166306. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518800869. View