» Articles » PMID: 31729638

Efficacy of School-Based Interventions for Improving Muscular Fitness Outcomes in Adolescent Boys: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Nov 16
PMID 31729638
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It has been reported that boys' and girls' physical activity (PA) levels decline throughout adolescence. Boys are at risk of physical inactivity during adolescence; however, in intervention research, they are an under-represented group relative to girls. It is suggested that the school environment may be central to developing interventions that support adolescents in meeting the current PA guidelines. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of school-based physical activity interventions for improving muscular fitness (MF) in adolescent males.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the preferred reporting systems for meta-analyses guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42018091023). Eligible studies were published in English within peer-reviewed articles. Searches were conducted in three databases, with an additional grey literature search in Google Scholar. Studies investigating MF outcomes were included.

Results: There were 43 data sets identified across 11 studies, from seven countries. Overall methodological quality of the studies was moderate-to-strong. Interventions targeting MF evidenced a small-to-medium effect (g = 0.32, CI 0.17, 0.48, p < 0.00). Subgroup analyses of MF delivery method resulted in small-to-medium effects: upper limb MF measures (g = 0.28, 95% CI - 0.02, 0.58, p = 0.07), lower limb MF measures (g = 0.28, 95% CI 0.09, 0.68, p = 0.03), combined MF activities (g = 0.24, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.49, p = 0.05), plyometric activities (g = 0.39, 95% CI 0.09, 0.68, p = 0.01), body weight (g = 0.27, 95% CI - 0.10, 0.65, p = 0.15), and traditional MF methods (g = 0.43, 95% CI 0.09, 0.78, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: School-based interventions which aimed to increase MF outcomes in adolescent boys demonstrated small-to-moderate effects. Traditional and plyometric methods of resistance training appear to be the most effective form of PA delivery in adolescent males. More quality research is required to assess the impact of MF delivered in the school environment to inform future intervention design.

Citing Articles

Association of physical activity, screen time and sleep with substance use in children and adolescents: a large sample cross-sectional study.

Su H, Lyu D, Huang K, Yan J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1432710.

PMID: 39484350 PMC: 11524877. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1432710.


Effects of Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Fitness and Cardiometabolic Health Biomarkers in Untrained Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gomez-Alvarez N, Boppre G, Hermosilla-Palma F, Reyes-Amigo T, Oliveira J, Fonseca H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274434 PMC: 11396522. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175221.


Physical activity and sedentary behavior among school-going adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: insights from the global school-based health survey.

Li H, Zhang W, Yan J PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17097.

PMID: 38680891 PMC: 11055511. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17097.


Supporting adolescents' participation in muscle-strengthening physical activity: protocol for the 'Resistance Training for Teens' (RT4T) hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness trial.

Kelly H, Smith J, Verdonschot A, Kennedy S, Scott J, McKay H BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e075488.

PMID: 37914300 PMC: 10626834. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075488.


A Deep Learning Neural Network to Classify Obesity Risk in Portuguese Adolescents Based on Physical Fitness Levels and Body Mass Index Percentiles: Insights for National Health Policies.

Forte P, Encarnacao S, Monteiro A, Teixeira J, Hattabi S, Sortwell A Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37503969 PMC: 10376847. DOI: 10.3390/bs13070522.


References
1.
Candow D, Chilibeck P . Differences in size, strength, and power of upper and lower body muscle groups in young and older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60(2):148-56. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/60.2.148. View

2.
Lloyd R, Faigenbaum A, Stone M, Oliver J, Jeffreys I, Moody J . Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 48(7):498-505. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952. View

3.
Lubans D, Cliff D . Muscular fitness, body composition and physical self-perception in adolescents. J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 14(3):216-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.003. View

4.
Cooper A, Goodman A, Page A, Sherar L, Esliger D, van Sluijs E . Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International children's accelerometry database (ICAD). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12:113. PMC: 4574095. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-015-0274-5. View

5.
Stratton G, Jones M, Fox K, Tolfrey K, Harris J, Maffulli N . BASES position statement on guidelines for resistance exercise in young people. J Sports Sci. 2004; 22(4):383-90. DOI: 10.1080/02640410310001641629. View